Did you not read far enough to see that only seven countries, which consist of Israel and other 100% vaccinated countries as well as geographically close microstates such as Gibraltar, are regarded as a "good epidemiological situation"?
I didn't, because the beginning paragraphs were sufficient to debunk your point that non-vaccinated people are being banned, when a more accurate description would be that it is now allowing vaccinated people to enter.
Which, frankly, will not be an improvement if I look at who is most enthusiastic about it in the shithole in which you currently reside.
Isn't that the same thing but with a different perspective?
No, as this is a move towards relaxation, whereas yours suggests a move towards repression. If there were a move towards repression, then it would be reasonable to think that this would be maintained in the future. In this case, likely not.
Did you not read far enough to see that only seven countries, which consist of Israel and other 100% vaccinated countries as well as geographically close microstates such as Gibraltar, are regarded as a "good epidemiological situation"?
I didn't, because the beginning paragraphs were sufficient to debunk your point that non-vaccinated people are being banned, when a more accurate description would be that it is now allowing vaccinated people to enter.
Which, frankly, will not be an improvement if I look at who is most enthusiastic about it in the shithole in which you currently reside.
Isn't that the same thing but with a different perspective?
What do you mean by that?
No, as this is a move towards relaxation, whereas yours suggests a move towards repression. If there were a move towards repression, then it would be reasonable to think that this would be maintained in the future. In this case, likely not.
I'd rather have non-vaccinated Americans.
That's just another path to the same place. Two steps forward one back. A pull of a barbed hook.