If it can be proven to benefit one side, then that would fall under campaign contributions. Personally, I see it as treason. I think they would say campaign finance violation.
I recall during the pointless hearings over tech censorship, Zuck said they deleted news about Bobulinski and the Biden laptop at the direction of the government. Thought it was weird that people didn't talk about that more.
If it can be proven to benefit one side, then that would fall under campaign contributions. Personally, I see it as treason. I think they would say campaign finance violation.
This I will believe only if I see the primary sources showing it, because it's so explosive and blatantly unconstitutional.
You can download all their source emails here :
https://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/ca-sos-big-tech-election-misinformation-pra-foia-2021/
I recall during the pointless hearings over tech censorship, Zuck said they deleted news about Bobulinski and the Biden laptop at the direction of the government. Thought it was weird that people didn't talk about that more.