If she didn't want to have a child, she'd have aborted.
The UK, while I was there at least, didn't let you have an abortion after you found out the gender. Seems more likely that she wanted a girl but got stuck with a boy to me.
If she didn't want to have a child, she'd have aborted.
That so? It follows from that, that there is no such thing as a mother with an unwanted child in the UK. Absurd on its face.
Seems more likely that she wanted a girl but got stuck with a boy to me.
Based on what? Funny how you don't make that same claim when mothers are abusing their daughters. Your selective BLM-style reasoning is bloody obvious: the very same thing is racist/sexist or not, depending on the race/sex of the victim.
Well, considering they fought for 11 billion years to have the "right" to do it, yes, that seems correct.
I'm sorry, but merely not wanting a child doesn't explain the level of abuse. Neglect wouldn't put that many bruises on him. There has to be a genuine hatred there.
Well, considering they fought for 11 billion years to have the "right" to do it, yes, that seems correct.
It seems correct that there is no woman in the UK with an unwanted child?
Are you completely insane, or are you trying to win an Oscar?
but merely not wanting a child doesn't explain the level of abuse. Neglect wouldn't put that many bruises on him.
If the explanations are correct, then I think she is a ChildFree cultist who resents the boy for depriving her of her freedom.
There has to be a genuine hatred there.
Well, you seem to assume that everyone is as hate-filled as you are. But let's say that you are correct. That would mean that every man who abuses a girl hates women, which means that contrary to your claim that 'misogyny is not real', it is. (If you weren't proof enough of it.)
If I was trying to win an Oscar, I'd write a dreadful propaganda piece about men being bad, like the predicted winner.
Have you known those people be that insane? They're stupid, feminist and a bit pathetic, but not insane. Let's not forget, your friends at GC openly advocate for abusing boys. Seems more likely that a feminist followed up on that ideology, which would also explain the sadistic treatment that 80 bruises on a 3 year old would be.
Even the incels draw the line at attacking kids. They might be wannabe mass shooters with ridiculous beliefs, but they don't attack kids. Women's worst is somehow even lower than them.
If she didn't want to have a child, she'd have aborted.
The UK, while I was there at least, didn't let you have an abortion after you found out the gender. Seems more likely that she wanted a girl but got stuck with a boy to me.
That so? It follows from that, that there is no such thing as a mother with an unwanted child in the UK. Absurd on its face.
Based on what? Funny how you don't make that same claim when mothers are abusing their daughters. Your selective BLM-style reasoning is bloody obvious: the very same thing is racist/sexist or not, depending on the race/sex of the victim.
Well, considering they fought for 11 billion years to have the "right" to do it, yes, that seems correct.
I'm sorry, but merely not wanting a child doesn't explain the level of abuse. Neglect wouldn't put that many bruises on him. There has to be a genuine hatred there.
It seems correct that there is no woman in the UK with an unwanted child?
Are you completely insane, or are you trying to win an Oscar?
If the explanations are correct, then I think she is a ChildFree cultist who resents the boy for depriving her of her freedom.
Well, you seem to assume that everyone is as hate-filled as you are. But let's say that you are correct. That would mean that every man who abuses a girl hates women, which means that contrary to your claim that 'misogyny is not real', it is. (If you weren't proof enough of it.)
If I was trying to win an Oscar, I'd write a dreadful propaganda piece about men being bad, like the predicted winner.
Have you known those people be that insane? They're stupid, feminist and a bit pathetic, but not insane. Let's not forget, your friends at GC openly advocate for abusing boys. Seems more likely that a feminist followed up on that ideology, which would also explain the sadistic treatment that 80 bruises on a 3 year old would be.
Even the incels draw the line at attacking kids. They might be wannabe mass shooters with ridiculous beliefs, but they don't attack kids. Women's worst is somehow even lower than them.