Well, considering they fought for 11 billion years to have the "right" to do it, yes, that seems correct.
It seems correct that there is no woman in the UK with an unwanted child?
Are you completely insane, or are you trying to win an Oscar?
but merely not wanting a child doesn't explain the level of abuse. Neglect wouldn't put that many bruises on him.
If the explanations are correct, then I think she is a ChildFree cultist who resents the boy for depriving her of her freedom.
There has to be a genuine hatred there.
Well, you seem to assume that everyone is as hate-filled as you are. But let's say that you are correct. That would mean that every man who abuses a girl hates women, which means that contrary to your claim that 'misogyny is not real', it is. (If you weren't proof enough of it.)
If I was trying to win an Oscar, I'd write a dreadful propaganda piece about men being bad, like the predicted winner.
Have you known those people be that insane? They're stupid, feminist and a bit pathetic, but not insane. Let's not forget, your friends at GC openly advocate for abusing boys. Seems more likely that a feminist followed up on that ideology, which would also explain the sadistic treatment that 80 bruises on a 3 year old would be.
Even the incels draw the line at attacking kids. They might be wannabe mass shooters with ridiculous beliefs, but they don't attack kids. Women's worst is somehow even lower than them.
If I was trying to win an Oscar, I'd write a dreadful propaganda piece about men being bad, like the predicted winner.
Nah, you're doing a pretty good job at pretending to be insane (if you're not) by claiming that there is no woman in the UK with an unwanted child.
Let's not forget, your friends at GC openly advocate for abusing boys.
I remember you calling German women aged 9 to 70 who were raped by USSR soldiers "Nazis" and saying that what THEEEY say cannot be believed - even though there are numerous confessions from the USSR itself that this happened, including from Stalin.
Seems more likely that a feminist followed up on that ideology
So you not only failed to back up your claims, you made two additional unsubstantiated claims, that she is a (1) feminist and that (2) she is following up on 'that ideology'. Let's see if you manage to prove this any better than you did the rest.
Even the incels draw the line at attacking kids. They might be wannabe mass shooters with ridiculous beliefs, but they don't attack kids. Women's worst is somehow even lower than them.
I don't think you want to compare men's worst to women's worst. Who rapes most children? Not your dreaded wahmen.
I'm pretty sure that if you never wanted a child, you'd abort. Her excuse is that she never wanted a child, not this one specifically. Of course some people have a child and regret it.
Read the article I was replying to. It never mentioned kids. Don't be as disingenuous as the feminists who define sexual assault as bad pick-up lines.
Nothing explains the level of sadism better than that. Social workers see hundreds of abuse and neglect cases, and they say this was the worst they'd ever seen.
True, when a woman does it, they call it a "sexual relationship with a minor." not rape.
I'm pretty sure that if you never wanted a child, you'd abort. Her excuse is that she never wanted a child, not this one specifically. Of course some people have a child and regret it.
???
This makes no sense.
Read the article I was replying to. It never mentioned kids. Don't be as disingenuous as the feminists who define sexual assault as bad pick-up lines.
How about violent group rape, which was what it is about. Is that sexual assault?
Social workers see hundreds of abuse and neglect cases
Social workers are, as a general rule, useless sponges on the public treasury. That said, I don't doubt that this case was uniquely bad.
True, when a woman does it, they call it a "sexual relationship with a minor." not rape.
It's against the law all the same. Who does it more? Or are you really so whacked that you think women are more likely than men to commit rape and child molestation?
It seems correct that there is no woman in the UK with an unwanted child?
Are you completely insane, or are you trying to win an Oscar?
If the explanations are correct, then I think she is a ChildFree cultist who resents the boy for depriving her of her freedom.
Well, you seem to assume that everyone is as hate-filled as you are. But let's say that you are correct. That would mean that every man who abuses a girl hates women, which means that contrary to your claim that 'misogyny is not real', it is. (If you weren't proof enough of it.)
If I was trying to win an Oscar, I'd write a dreadful propaganda piece about men being bad, like the predicted winner.
Have you known those people be that insane? They're stupid, feminist and a bit pathetic, but not insane. Let's not forget, your friends at GC openly advocate for abusing boys. Seems more likely that a feminist followed up on that ideology, which would also explain the sadistic treatment that 80 bruises on a 3 year old would be.
Even the incels draw the line at attacking kids. They might be wannabe mass shooters with ridiculous beliefs, but they don't attack kids. Women's worst is somehow even lower than them.
Nah, you're doing a pretty good job at pretending to be insane (if you're not) by claiming that there is no woman in the UK with an unwanted child.
I remember you calling German women aged 9 to 70 who were raped by USSR soldiers "Nazis" and saying that what THEEEY say cannot be believed - even though there are numerous confessions from the USSR itself that this happened, including from Stalin.
So you not only failed to back up your claims, you made two additional unsubstantiated claims, that she is a (1) feminist and that (2) she is following up on 'that ideology'. Let's see if you manage to prove this any better than you did the rest.
I don't think you want to compare men's worst to women's worst. Who rapes most children? Not your dreaded wahmen.
I'm pretty sure that if you never wanted a child, you'd abort. Her excuse is that she never wanted a child, not this one specifically. Of course some people have a child and regret it.
Read the article I was replying to. It never mentioned kids. Don't be as disingenuous as the feminists who define sexual assault as bad pick-up lines.
Nothing explains the level of sadism better than that. Social workers see hundreds of abuse and neglect cases, and they say this was the worst they'd ever seen.
True, when a woman does it, they call it a "sexual relationship with a minor." not rape.
???
This makes no sense.
How about violent group rape, which was what it is about. Is that sexual assault?
Social workers are, as a general rule, useless sponges on the public treasury. That said, I don't doubt that this case was uniquely bad.
It's against the law all the same. Who does it more? Or are you really so whacked that you think women are more likely than men to commit rape and child molestation?