Ah, the United Femdom. Can't seem to escape stories from there, they always end up on Men's Rights pages.
So, we have a woman who wanted a daughter and therefore abuses the child, leaving dangerous situations for him to get into in the hope he would die, including open bottles of bleach and ladders out of windows.
We have social workers saying it's the worst thing they've seen, cataloguing 80 bruises on him.
We have a defendant that feels zero remorse as well as tried to shift the blame to the nearest man. (how surprising...)
But then we have a female judge, who sees that it's one of the in-group harming the out-group and therefore means nothing.
Judge Penelope Belcher said she was imposing a non-custodial sentence so the defendant can work with the probation service and receive support for her personality disorder.
If this was a man abusing a child, he'd get far more.
If this was someone of either gender abusing a girl, they'd get far more.
But it's not, so it doesn't matter.
Where are the staunch woman defenders to explain this one?
But then we have a female judge, who sees that it's one of the in-group harming the out-group and therefore means nothing.
exactly like nogs. women are the nogs of gender. I defend a statement that women would behave exactly like nogs if they were as strong. They both have an emotional reaction, sometimes violently, to words they dont like. The only difference is women are much weaker.
There's absolutely nothing to substantiate it. You made this up based on your delusions that the wimmenz are after you and trying to kill you and all other men.
But then we have a female judge, who sees that it's one of the in-group harming the out-group and therefore means nothing.
What is your evidence that the sentence would be any different if the judge had not been female?
If this was someone of either gender abusing a girl, they'd get far more.
Prove it.
Where are the staunch woman defenders to explain this one?
Right here. You're full of shit, as usual. Speaking of which, have "they" managed to kill you yet with that "virus created by women to kill men", and with that "vaccine created by women to kill men"? You said they'd switch out the Pfizer vaccine for the AZ vaccine to kill you.
Even if there isn't, that doesn't make the sentence correct. You're really trying to deflect this whole thing by calling out my assumption? By what I know of my former country, my logic works.
Common sense? When have you ever seen a child abuser get such a low sentence?
^
I never caught Covid and I don't plan to be vaccinated for it at any point. Did you see that the fatality rate for AZ has already doubled since they started vaccinating under 60s, even in the Government's questionable metrics?
Even if there isn't, that doesn't make the sentence correct.
Absolutely not. She should be hanged from the highest trees - by lawful authorities, after a fair trial. No mercy for child abusers.
My objection is not to you pointing out that this sentence is absurd. It is. My objection is to the unsubstantiated claims that you are making, and unsubstantiated claims of 'sexism' - which is what feminists do.
Common sense? When have you ever seen a child abuser get such a low sentence?
Slow tap... low sentences are universal, boy.
I never caught Covid and I don't plan to be vaccinated for it at any point.
If you claimed that they would swap out Pfizer for AZ, and you did, why wouldn't you claim that they would swap out any other injection you're going to get in the future with AZ (or even pure arsenic), just to kill you.
Did you see that the fatality rate for AZ has already doubled since they started vaccinating under 60s, even in the Government's questionable metrics?
Like I've said several times...neglect doesn't equal this. People who don't care about a child don't attack it, they just ignore it. The motive claimed doesn't go with the actions.
Yeah, no. I highly doubt a man would walk for this.
It was a suggestion, not a definitive answer. I still think the excuse will be a new variant that's deadlier and therefore that vaccine needs to be unblocked.
Could be incompetence. Has anyone seen the "professor" that created it? She was all over the place before people started dying.
You may be downvoted, but you're right. Let's not fall into the same trap of victimhood and moral indignation that our old enemies do, however easy it may be.
Ah, the United Femdom. Can't seem to escape stories from there, they always end up on Men's Rights pages.
So, we have a woman who wanted a daughter and therefore abuses the child, leaving dangerous situations for him to get into in the hope he would die, including open bottles of bleach and ladders out of windows.
We have social workers saying it's the worst thing they've seen, cataloguing 80 bruises on him.
We have a defendant that feels zero remorse as well as tried to shift the blame to the nearest man. (how surprising...)
But then we have a female judge, who sees that it's one of the in-group harming the out-group and therefore means nothing.
If this was a man abusing a child, he'd get far more.
If this was someone of either gender abusing a girl, they'd get far more.
But it's not, so it doesn't matter.
Where are the staunch woman defenders to explain this one?
exactly like nogs. women are the nogs of gender. I defend a statement that women would behave exactly like nogs if they were as strong. They both have an emotional reaction, sometimes violently, to words they dont like. The only difference is women are much weaker.
There's absolutely nothing to substantiate it. You made this up based on your delusions that the wimmenz are after you and trying to kill you and all other men.
What is your evidence that the sentence would be any different if the judge had not been female?
Prove it.
Right here. You're full of shit, as usual. Speaking of which, have "they" managed to kill you yet with that "virus created by women to kill men", and with that "vaccine created by women to kill men"? You said they'd switch out the Pfizer vaccine for the AZ vaccine to kill you.
The one thing I think is that if it was a man doing this he would have gone to jail, but because she is a women she is basically free of consequences.
Even if there isn't, that doesn't make the sentence correct. You're really trying to deflect this whole thing by calling out my assumption? By what I know of my former country, my logic works.
Common sense? When have you ever seen a child abuser get such a low sentence?
^
I never caught Covid and I don't plan to be vaccinated for it at any point. Did you see that the fatality rate for AZ has already doubled since they started vaccinating under 60s, even in the Government's questionable metrics?
Absolutely not. She should be hanged from the highest trees - by lawful authorities, after a fair trial. No mercy for child abusers.
My objection is not to you pointing out that this sentence is absurd. It is. My objection is to the unsubstantiated claims that you are making, and unsubstantiated claims of 'sexism' - which is what feminists do.
Slow tap... low sentences are universal, boy.
If you claimed that they would swap out Pfizer for AZ, and you did, why wouldn't you claim that they would swap out any other injection you're going to get in the future with AZ (or even pure arsenic), just to kill you.
Must be The Genocide.
Like I've said several times...neglect doesn't equal this. People who don't care about a child don't attack it, they just ignore it. The motive claimed doesn't go with the actions.
Yeah, no. I highly doubt a man would walk for this.
It was a suggestion, not a definitive answer. I still think the excuse will be a new variant that's deadlier and therefore that vaccine needs to be unblocked.
Could be incompetence. Has anyone seen the "professor" that created it? She was all over the place before people started dying.
You may be downvoted, but you're right. Let's not fall into the same trap of victimhood and moral indignation that our old enemies do, however easy it may be.