Christian apologetics are worthless against atheists. They won't convert anyone who doesn't want to be converted. The same applies to conservatives vs leftists. The only way to change someone's mind is by making them live through being woefully wrong.
More accurately, anything that is/can be moderated that isn't specifically right wing will become left wing. A true free speech zone without any authority that can force the community down a certain path will become right wing. The issue is that the left are very pernicious about maneuvering themselves into positions of power so they can cram their views down on people.
People tend to self-segregate in locations where they think they fit in and don't want to spend all their time arguing with everyone else because they're the outsider.
It's the same reason major cities in the US have a Chinatown and Little Italy: people from China and Italy wanted to be among their own.
Leftists have "free speech" forums: reddit and twitter. They can say whatever they want, because whatever they want to say falls within the Overton window of the people running those platforms, and they don't want to say things that fall outside that window and would get them banned.
"the left" never seems to want to participate. I enjoy thinking about community management, moderation, and the theory of such things.
What if offering terms such as "overton window" requires one to believe them; which then causes a conflict of reason between believers/non-believers, which represents division by suggestion from those offering the idol called "overton window"; and to then manage; moderate; control these conflicts they offer contradictions to both sides of the belief based conflicts of reason?
This practice of controlling human reasoning is called talmudic reasoning; which also teaches to use implication (if/then) over reason (truth vs false). And now you may theorize why left (democrat); right (republican) and middle (liberal/conservative) are all so called jewish institutions or in close adherence to capitalism; communism; socialism; satanism; fascism and so on aka so called jewish mysticism?
Who's offering the -isms to ones free will of choice; which when consented to creates all these conflicts of reason?
Because it seems to accurately describe the reality that we see.
The reality we perceive as inspiration through our senses does not accurately describe itself. It inspires us to build our comprehension of all perceived information.
In reality you are ONE potential within ALL potentiality, and ALL information is predefined and freely offered to your perception as inspiration; while you lack the comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived (potentiality) means.
You are tricked to ignore ALL reality for the "accurately described" suggestions of other ONEs within ALL; who use words as substitutes (as idols; as fiction) to prevent you from comprehending reality.
I don't see what the age of the term has to do with it.
It simply shows the contradiction between believing that the world is millions of years old; and believing that a half a century old term can define such a reality? It should eventually inspire you to question the inversion of reality that is "time"; which represents a measurement of what? Motion; which acts how? Constantly changing; which is contradicted by what? Affixed states (past; present and future).
They suggest the affixed states to trick us to ignore motion, and how the constant change we are in demands constant adaptation from us; which we ignore by mentally stagnating our comprehension with affixed beliefs (past; present; future).
I'm sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about.
You sense inspiration by perceiving things in motion. All your senses represent adaptation to motion; it's why you perceive, and it represents your (ONE) direct communication with ALL.
Example "grass"...it communicates itself through inspiring vision; hearing; smell; feel; taste; resonance etc. Yet nature does not brand it "grass"; because that would be in ignorance of motion. Another ONE uses the word "grass" to get you to consent by your free will of chocie to believe his definition of reality though the term "grass".
If ONE consents to believe it; ONE idolizes a word; which allows the ONE offering it to act in the name of that word to define reality for the ONE ignoring reality by believing the word. "grass " represents fiction in ignorance of reality (motion) and so does all other words. We are being tricked through spell-craft to corrupt our communication with reality and our comprehension of it.
Next; to believe and then to act upon beliefs creates a conflict with all those who do not chose to believe what you believe: these conflicts are called reason aka the belief in truth versus false aka a fictitious conflict in ignorance of reality.
This is how the few divide the many through suggestion...offer beliefs (-ism); brand both sides within the resulting conflict of reason; then offer both sides contradictions to keep them in conflict with each other; while ignoring reality.
Implying sounds with no sense; yet you perceived what I wrote; so you used your senses already.
lunatic
a) implies madness aka disorder of intellect (comprehension) yet what if (the natural) order is defined by motion offering constantly changing inspiration to our senses; which in return would mean that upholding beliefs represents a restriction of comprehending that motion?
b) Luna (pertaining to the moon) refers to the fear of the missing the light (Helios; pertaining to the sun), which like all fears represent death; which represents ones choice of ignorance towards that which is (life) for that which will be (death) aka want over need; death over life. Selfish ignorance by free will of choice.
I have a thick skin when it comes to people saying nigger all the time and have no legitimately questionable views, so I could definitely say free speech forums are for me.
One thing I noticed happening in free speech forums is fighting between different groups in the forum itself when the groups allowed to separate.
Yeah, though I was talking more about reddit and 8chan in it's prime before Jim Watkins decided to backstab everyone to cater exclusively to Qboomers with the 8kun relaunch.
It was not uncommon for different boards to be constantly fighting each other.
didnt watch but best guess is that normies don't really have opinions outside of what's acceptable by society, or if they do, they don't feel a need to express it, so sites that allow that kind of speech only garner attention from people with those opinions.
Inclusion is always a mistake. A lack of exclusionary elitism is what got us here.
Christian apologetics are worthless against atheists. They won't convert anyone who doesn't want to be converted. The same applies to conservatives vs leftists. The only way to change someone's mind is by making them live through being woefully wrong.
More accurately, anything that is/can be moderated that isn't specifically right wing will become left wing. A true free speech zone without any authority that can force the community down a certain path will become right wing. The issue is that the left are very pernicious about maneuvering themselves into positions of power so they can cram their views down on people.
People tend to self-segregate in locations where they think they fit in and don't want to spend all their time arguing with everyone else because they're the outsider.
It's the same reason major cities in the US have a Chinatown and Little Italy: people from China and Italy wanted to be among their own.
Leftists have "free speech" forums: reddit and twitter. They can say whatever they want, because whatever they want to say falls within the Overton window of the people running those platforms, and they don't want to say things that fall outside that window and would get them banned.
read this.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/01/neutral-vs-conservative-the-eternal-struggle/
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Overton+window&year_start=1500&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3# Now ask yourself why a made up term from 2005 would help you to comprehend reality?
What if offering terms such as "overton window" requires one to believe them; which then causes a conflict of reason between believers/non-believers, which represents division by suggestion from those offering the idol called "overton window"; and to then manage; moderate; control these conflicts they offer contradictions to both sides of the belief based conflicts of reason?
This practice of controlling human reasoning is called talmudic reasoning; which also teaches to use implication (if/then) over reason (truth vs false). And now you may theorize why left (democrat); right (republican) and middle (liberal/conservative) are all so called jewish institutions or in close adherence to capitalism; communism; socialism; satanism; fascism and so on aka so called jewish mysticism?
Who's offering the -isms to ones free will of choice; which when consented to creates all these conflicts of reason?
The reality we perceive as inspiration through our senses does not accurately describe itself. It inspires us to build our comprehension of all perceived information.
In reality you are ONE potential within ALL potentiality, and ALL information is predefined and freely offered to your perception as inspiration; while you lack the comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived (potentiality) means.
You are tricked to ignore ALL reality for the "accurately described" suggestions of other ONEs within ALL; who use words as substitutes (as idols; as fiction) to prevent you from comprehending reality.
It simply shows the contradiction between believing that the world is millions of years old; and believing that a half a century old term can define such a reality? It should eventually inspire you to question the inversion of reality that is "time"; which represents a measurement of what? Motion; which acts how? Constantly changing; which is contradicted by what? Affixed states (past; present and future).
They suggest the affixed states to trick us to ignore motion, and how the constant change we are in demands constant adaptation from us; which we ignore by mentally stagnating our comprehension with affixed beliefs (past; present; future).
You sense inspiration by perceiving things in motion. All your senses represent adaptation to motion; it's why you perceive, and it represents your (ONE) direct communication with ALL.
Example "grass"...it communicates itself through inspiring vision; hearing; smell; feel; taste; resonance etc. Yet nature does not brand it "grass"; because that would be in ignorance of motion. Another ONE uses the word "grass" to get you to consent by your free will of chocie to believe his definition of reality though the term "grass".
If ONE consents to believe it; ONE idolizes a word; which allows the ONE offering it to act in the name of that word to define reality for the ONE ignoring reality by believing the word. "grass " represents fiction in ignorance of reality (motion) and so does all other words. We are being tricked through spell-craft to corrupt our communication with reality and our comprehension of it.
Next; to believe and then to act upon beliefs creates a conflict with all those who do not chose to believe what you believe: these conflicts are called reason aka the belief in truth versus false aka a fictitious conflict in ignorance of reality.
This is how the few divide the many through suggestion...offer beliefs (-ism); brand both sides within the resulting conflict of reason; then offer both sides contradictions to keep them in conflict with each other; while ignoring reality.
Implying sounds with no sense; yet you perceived what I wrote; so you used your senses already.
a) implies madness aka disorder of intellect (comprehension) yet what if (the natural) order is defined by motion offering constantly changing inspiration to our senses; which in return would mean that upholding beliefs represents a restriction of comprehending that motion?
b) Luna (pertaining to the moon) refers to the fear of the missing the light (Helios; pertaining to the sun), which like all fears represent death; which represents ones choice of ignorance towards that which is (life) for that which will be (death) aka want over need; death over life. Selfish ignorance by free will of choice.
I have a thick skin when it comes to people saying nigger all the time and have no legitimately questionable views, so I could definitely say free speech forums are for me.
One thing I noticed happening in free speech forums is fighting between different groups in the forum itself when the groups allowed to separate.
Yeah, though I was talking more about reddit and 8chan in it's prime before Jim Watkins decided to backstab everyone to cater exclusively to Qboomers with the 8kun relaunch.
It was not uncommon for different boards to be constantly fighting each other.
didnt watch but best guess is that normies don't really have opinions outside of what's acceptable by society, or if they do, they don't feel a need to express it, so sites that allow that kind of speech only garner attention from people with those opinions.