The theory isn't that Jews are replacing anyone, nor did Tucker suggest that they are behind it. In fact, he explicitly suggested that the Democrats were doing it simply to gain votes.
But really, it's probably bold of me to assume that much thought went into it. They probably just went down a list of the usual suspects like "racist" and "misogynist" and picked whichever one they thought would defame Tucker more.
I bet it wouldn't be that difficult to get these people to admit that they support replacement, either, even as they maintain that it doesn't exist as a concept. It's the way it always is with them. "Nobody is taking away your games, but if they are, it's a good thing."
I bet it wouldn't be that difficult to get these people to admit that they support replacement, either, even as they maintain that it doesn't exist as a concept. It's the way it always is with them. "Nobody is taking away your games, but if they are, it's a good thing."
The theory isn't that Jews are replacing anyone, nor did Tucker suggest that they are behind it. In fact, he explicitly suggested that the Democrats were doing it simply to gain votes.
But really, it's probably bold of me to assume that much thought went into it. They probably just went down a list of the usual suspects like "racist" and "misogynist" and picked whichever one they thought would defame Tucker more.
I bet it wouldn't be that difficult to get these people to admit that they support replacement, either, even as they maintain that it doesn't exist as a concept. It's the way it always is with them. "Nobody is taking away your games, but if they are, it's a good thing."
Case in point: https://gab.com/PNN/posts/106078033452687290
Methinks the author doth protest too much...