I can agree with that. But white peoples should absolutely embrace, promote, and protect their cultures and communities. That's how every other racial and ethnic demigraphic operates. Unless they agree to stop, whites must reciprocate. Anything else would be suicide.
That's how every other racial and ethnic demographic operates.
No, they don't. That's just the point. The "fellow whites" schtick happens for fucking every race, most of the time pushed by Leftists or Resentment Mongers.
When some idiot starts using racial and ethnic solidarity, it is always defined only by the racialist activist themselves, who tends to be a Leftist that is looking for an excuse. Black Supremacists don't give a single solitary shit about blacks who disagree with them. It's purely about power for some specific leader. Dixiecrats didn't give a single solitary shit about poor whites during Jim Crow. The mainland Chinese were only told to care about the genocide of Chinese immigrants in countries that weren't allied to the Chinese Communists. Even now, you've got Jewish Leftists pushing apologetics for Black hate crimes against Hasidic Jews. We can even move it out from race. Leftist Christians do this. Leftist gays do this. Leftist transgenders do this. Leftist women do this.
Lo and behold, when the racialists open their mouth and start describing what they mean by "white", "black", "jew", "christian", "gay", "woman", you see that their definition doesn't include all people who are actually definable under that label. Just the ones that submit to the leading racialist's will. That's why non-Leftists are coons, race traitors, gender traitors, not real Christians, nazis, etc.
That is why whites abandoned racialism, and why they've done it repeatedly. Screaming that you're for white people, and passing progressive policies, only promotes progressivism... which doesn't help whites. It doesn't help anyone, except the person doing the screaming.
If you stand there and say that you are only interested in what benefits all Whites, then that includes white Leftists who will use that to their immediate advantage, and you won't be able to argue against Leftist protectionist policies... that will hurt whites.
Whites are lucky that they pulled out of racial progressivism before it was too late, look what it's done to Blacks, to Indians, to Africa, to the nationalists of countries in the eastern block that promoted their nation's interest under communism, to the Cambodians, to the Chinese, even to Jews who were stupid enough to move to the Soviet Union or live in a Kibbutz.
If you want to defend a people, you defend them from collectivists who would sacrifice them. That includes racialists who are just as happy to sacrifice their race as much as the Unions were prepared to sacrifice their workers.
I'm confused. Are you suggesting white people, who are losing on every cultural and political front in the world, and are the only racial demographic in America with a decreasing life expectancy, are somehow "winning" as a result of abandoning racialism?
Whites thrived when they abandoned racialism, the South's rapid growth post the Jim Crow era is evidence of that. Since the Civil War, the South's development had been stunted and haggard because of it's racial Progressivism. That's why FDR's $25 /hr minimum wage for White cotton workers didn't improve anything in the South (That's around $230 /hr now, btw). There were extreme problems with hunger and poverty among Whites in the South.
As Goldwater Conservativism took root, their lives significantly improved.
Whites in the North were fine too... right up until they started adopting racial progressivism, this time in a way that targeted them, rather than claimed to protect them.
This is why the difference between white Leftists and white Conservatives is fucking stark: White Leftists are having effectively no children, report huge mental health problems, are poorer, self-hating, and commit suicide more often. This is not reflected at all by White Conservatives, including tons of White Southerners.
Progressive policies, as with Indians and Blacks, are destroying Whites. Where we do tend to find worse off White Conservatives, this tends to be more in line with globalists (particularly White Leftists again) who are using corporate power to destroy rural and middle America, cartelize all businesses in an industry or region, eradicate small business, and force people to move into Democratic cities. Whites whose communities are being targeted by Progressivism, end up being worse off.
And again, you can look at the situation of Blacks and Indians to see where racialism gets you. They've been effectively smashed.
Leftism churns up groups and spits them out once it's finished exploiting them. Then it turns around and targets them with more identity groups later. It's part of their circle of death.
And if you're crazy enough to just trust that whites won't be communist subversives, then you deserve to fail.
The other white people, need to band together with other anti-Lefists.
I can agree with that. But white peoples should absolutely embrace, promote, and protect their cultures and communities. That's how every other racial and ethnic demigraphic operates. Unless they agree to stop, whites must reciprocate. Anything else would be suicide.
No, they don't. That's just the point. The "fellow whites" schtick happens for fucking every race, most of the time pushed by Leftists or Resentment Mongers.
When some idiot starts using racial and ethnic solidarity, it is always defined only by the racialist activist themselves, who tends to be a Leftist that is looking for an excuse. Black Supremacists don't give a single solitary shit about blacks who disagree with them. It's purely about power for some specific leader. Dixiecrats didn't give a single solitary shit about poor whites during Jim Crow. The mainland Chinese were only told to care about the genocide of Chinese immigrants in countries that weren't allied to the Chinese Communists. Even now, you've got Jewish Leftists pushing apologetics for Black hate crimes against Hasidic Jews. We can even move it out from race. Leftist Christians do this. Leftist gays do this. Leftist transgenders do this. Leftist women do this.
Lo and behold, when the racialists open their mouth and start describing what they mean by "white", "black", "jew", "christian", "gay", "woman", you see that their definition doesn't include all people who are actually definable under that label. Just the ones that submit to the leading racialist's will. That's why non-Leftists are coons, race traitors, gender traitors, not real Christians, nazis, etc.
That is why whites abandoned racialism, and why they've done it repeatedly. Screaming that you're for white people, and passing progressive policies, only promotes progressivism... which doesn't help whites. It doesn't help anyone, except the person doing the screaming.
If you stand there and say that you are only interested in what benefits all Whites, then that includes white Leftists who will use that to their immediate advantage, and you won't be able to argue against Leftist protectionist policies... that will hurt whites.
Whites are lucky that they pulled out of racial progressivism before it was too late, look what it's done to Blacks, to Indians, to Africa, to the nationalists of countries in the eastern block that promoted their nation's interest under communism, to the Cambodians, to the Chinese, even to Jews who were stupid enough to move to the Soviet Union or live in a Kibbutz.
If you want to defend a people, you defend them from collectivists who would sacrifice them. That includes racialists who are just as happy to sacrifice their race as much as the Unions were prepared to sacrifice their workers.
I'm confused. Are you suggesting white people, who are losing on every cultural and political front in the world, and are the only racial demographic in America with a decreasing life expectancy, are somehow "winning" as a result of abandoning racialism?
Whites thrived when they abandoned racialism, the South's rapid growth post the Jim Crow era is evidence of that. Since the Civil War, the South's development had been stunted and haggard because of it's racial Progressivism. That's why FDR's $25 /hr minimum wage for White cotton workers didn't improve anything in the South (That's around $230 /hr now, btw). There were extreme problems with hunger and poverty among Whites in the South.
As Goldwater Conservativism took root, their lives significantly improved.
Whites in the North were fine too... right up until they started adopting racial progressivism, this time in a way that targeted them, rather than claimed to protect them.
This is why the difference between white Leftists and white Conservatives is fucking stark: White Leftists are having effectively no children, report huge mental health problems, are poorer, self-hating, and commit suicide more often. This is not reflected at all by White Conservatives, including tons of White Southerners.
Progressive policies, as with Indians and Blacks, are destroying Whites. Where we do tend to find worse off White Conservatives, this tends to be more in line with globalists (particularly White Leftists again) who are using corporate power to destroy rural and middle America, cartelize all businesses in an industry or region, eradicate small business, and force people to move into Democratic cities. Whites whose communities are being targeted by Progressivism, end up being worse off.
And again, you can look at the situation of Blacks and Indians to see where racialism gets you. They've been effectively smashed.
Leftism churns up groups and spits them out once it's finished exploiting them. Then it turns around and targets them with more identity groups later. It's part of their circle of death.