Post Reported for: Misinformation: no mention of 'deeply religious'
OP, can you cite where there was anything in the study regarding religiosity of the female subjects? I can't seem to get past the abstract. I tried Sci Hub, but didn't get anywhere either.
As I said to TheImpossible1, "God's love" is such an unscientific term that can't be well defined it has effectively no place in a scientific paper. You can't measure it or even properly identify it. It genuinely makes me think the screenshot is fake.
I believe that isn't actually from the paper, it's this person's summary of what's in it. The page appears legitimate, 44k followers and nobody questioning the veracity.
Post Reported for: Misinformation: no mention of 'deeply religious'
OP, can you cite where there was anything in the study regarding religiosity of the female subjects? I can't seem to get past the abstract. I tried Sci Hub, but didn't get anywhere either.
Someone else posted this:
Here's the psychologist who creates a summary of these papers who mentioned the religiousness of the individual - https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1383291092620042245?s=20
As I said to TheImpossible1, "God's love" is such an unscientific term that can't be well defined it has effectively no place in a scientific paper. You can't measure it or even properly identify it. It genuinely makes me think the screenshot is fake.
Yeah may be true; I don’t have an opinion on it really, I just was trying to help in case you didn’t see the other link.
I appreciate that.
Here's the psychologist who creates a summary of these papers who mentioned the religiousness of the individual -
https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1383291092620042245?s=20
See my other two comments.
OP must have seen the actual paper somehow.
https://mobile.twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1383291092620042245
That seems really weird to put in a Scientific paper. It's not even a well defined term. That's suspicious enough that I'm not convinced it's real.
You'd have to define what "God's love" is in the paper in order for you to put that in the conclusion.
I believe that isn't actually from the paper, it's this person's summary of what's in it. The page appears legitimate, 44k followers and nobody questioning the veracity.