You know there are plenty of us women who aren't part of that "they," right? You'd sacrifice the traditional homesteading/homeschooling ones because of this generalization? Or would you rather they keep fighting on the homefront for America's roots?
I've come to believe with more and more certainty every day that the goal of everything (women in combat, feminizing men, trans encouragement, extended public school hours, discouragement of marriage...) is the destruction of the family, so the state can raise our children. Don't give in to it out of bitterness.
Of course it is. They want children to be born and raised in creches, property of "everyone" and not their parents (under the cry of "children aren't proprety"; they don't consider public property to be "property" either, and that's why they think they can destroy public monuments and buildings with impunity.)
And yeah, I've always believed (as a female) that equality means just that. Females should be up for the draft, too. Maybe in some couples it would have been better for the wife to go and the husband to stay. :P
And it's interesting how the news never talked about all the women who were happy to quit the factories and go back home after WW2.
Depends on the population. One that's off the rails and overpopulated with no predators, no significant disease, and no selection could probably use an "antlerless hunt", as it were.
Except, when it comes to women, it's not a small, vocal minority. You should check the percentages on what women support. At some point, men have to stop shielding women from the consequences of their actions. It's not noble to protect women who are treating you like garbage, but do it with a smile and soft words, and a pretense of innocence, and act as if the sacrifices they're forcing you to make imply you're noble nature.
You know why there are so many cucks in the world? So many of these degenerate relationships where 4 guys are in "polyamorous" relationships where they are all eating shit and giving up their dignity just to gain sexual access with a woman who is a 3-4/10? Why so many men are always quick to defend women even when they're being pieces of shit? Because things are actually slanted in women's favor in every single way. So even though she's about on par with them in reality or maybe even below them, the way things are set up socially/economically, her value is artificially inflated.
They sell you this narrative of what it means to be a good man. Like it's noble to constantly take it on the chin and still treat them like princesses. And men fall for it. Whether conservative or liberal.
And if you want to understand the destruction of the family. You have to understand hypergamy. Women always want someone higher in the social order than they are. But when you have gigantic salaries being handed to undeserving women, high positions that they didn't earn being given to them, and non-stop propaganda devaluing men and raising the value of women. You get women who have insane valuations of themselves, and who all think they belong with top 10% men. Women who make a lot of money still want a man who makes more than them, and view a man who makes them same amount as vastly inferior.
But even conservative women still buy in to all the liberal bullshit about building up women's self-esteem like it's too low or something. They still harshly reprimand any men who tell the truth about anything that would lower their value. They try to make it absolutely verboten, or like it's some great moral crime to mention that they get less attractive as they get older, or that being a single mother lowers their value, or even that being fat is gross. They support the fictions that artificially inflate their value. And they all support those things that are good for women at the expense of men, regardless of how unfair it is. All those divorce laws and child custody laws and taking taxes from men and giving them to women and everything. Shit even most conservative women support "gun control", and every single shitty liberal/leftist movement is primarily supported by women. They are also the main proponents of socialism/communism. But nobody will even acknowledge this, because they're afraid of standing on their own, and they know that even conservatives will attack someone who tells these truths.
People have way too much sympathy for women. They allow them to get away with virtually anything. And predictably, it creates a lot of shitty women. And in case you doubt this, just look at any research about biases. Women have an in-group bias toward other women, and men have an out-group bias toward women. And yet all we hear about is how bad women have it. Ironically, the only reason anyone even tolerates that constant complaining and bullshit about them being oppressed is precisely because it is UNTRUE. If it were true, nobody would listen to a word of that. You think in the middle east where women are actually somewhat oppressed, that people listen to women complaining about it? Obviously not. The more you hear about that kind of thing in your society, the less true it is.
People need to realize that you aren't living in a conservative world. So even if you want a setup like existed in the past, you can't have it. That's reality. All you're doing is allowing women to have all the benefits of liberal social and political policy, with none of the downsides, and still be protected against everything and treated like princesses. It's like companies who keep their windfalls and socialize their losses through government bailouts. They are experiencing none of the downsides of capitalism and the free market, and all of the upsides. This is what women do through the government as well. No matter what choices they make, even if they choose to get knocked up by some criminal scumbag piece of shit who abandons them, they still take men's tax money through the government to care for themselves. There are no negative consequences for shitty behavior of women. And not even conservatives will acknowledge it. They are more likely to attack the person pointing it out.
So I say, let women face some real consequences for once. This isn't even a real consequence. None of them will actually even be drafted.
You know there are plenty of us women who aren't part of that "they," right? You'd sacrifice the traditional homesteading/homeschooling ones because of this generalization? Or would you rather they keep fighting on the homefront for America's roots?
I've come to believe with more and more certainty every day that the goal of everything (women in combat, feminizing men, trans encouragement, extended public school hours, discouragement of marriage...) is the destruction of the family, so the state can raise our children. Don't give in to it out of bitterness.
Of course it is. They want children to be born and raised in creches, property of "everyone" and not their parents (under the cry of "children aren't proprety"; they don't consider public property to be "property" either, and that's why they think they can destroy public monuments and buildings with impunity.)
And yeah, I've always believed (as a female) that equality means just that. Females should be up for the draft, too. Maybe in some couples it would have been better for the wife to go and the husband to stay. :P
And it's interesting how the news never talked about all the women who were happy to quit the factories and go back home after WW2.
Depends on the population. One that's off the rails and overpopulated with no predators, no significant disease, and no selection could probably use an "antlerless hunt", as it were.
I don't think they would be drafting people over 60, which is the only female demographic that turned out against the Harris Administration.
I'm not going to have children, so my views and opinions on that are as irrelevant as women's view of what masculinity is.
So you don't think women should have equal responsibilities as men. What rights are you willing to give up to make that fair?
Which is exactly why women do not belong in the military, at all.
Except, when it comes to women, it's not a small, vocal minority. You should check the percentages on what women support. At some point, men have to stop shielding women from the consequences of their actions. It's not noble to protect women who are treating you like garbage, but do it with a smile and soft words, and a pretense of innocence, and act as if the sacrifices they're forcing you to make imply you're noble nature.
You know why there are so many cucks in the world? So many of these degenerate relationships where 4 guys are in "polyamorous" relationships where they are all eating shit and giving up their dignity just to gain sexual access with a woman who is a 3-4/10? Why so many men are always quick to defend women even when they're being pieces of shit? Because things are actually slanted in women's favor in every single way. So even though she's about on par with them in reality or maybe even below them, the way things are set up socially/economically, her value is artificially inflated.
They sell you this narrative of what it means to be a good man. Like it's noble to constantly take it on the chin and still treat them like princesses. And men fall for it. Whether conservative or liberal.
And if you want to understand the destruction of the family. You have to understand hypergamy. Women always want someone higher in the social order than they are. But when you have gigantic salaries being handed to undeserving women, high positions that they didn't earn being given to them, and non-stop propaganda devaluing men and raising the value of women. You get women who have insane valuations of themselves, and who all think they belong with top 10% men. Women who make a lot of money still want a man who makes more than them, and view a man who makes them same amount as vastly inferior.
But even conservative women still buy in to all the liberal bullshit about building up women's self-esteem like it's too low or something. They still harshly reprimand any men who tell the truth about anything that would lower their value. They try to make it absolutely verboten, or like it's some great moral crime to mention that they get less attractive as they get older, or that being a single mother lowers their value, or even that being fat is gross. They support the fictions that artificially inflate their value. And they all support those things that are good for women at the expense of men, regardless of how unfair it is. All those divorce laws and child custody laws and taking taxes from men and giving them to women and everything. Shit even most conservative women support "gun control", and every single shitty liberal/leftist movement is primarily supported by women. They are also the main proponents of socialism/communism. But nobody will even acknowledge this, because they're afraid of standing on their own, and they know that even conservatives will attack someone who tells these truths.
People have way too much sympathy for women. They allow them to get away with virtually anything. And predictably, it creates a lot of shitty women. And in case you doubt this, just look at any research about biases. Women have an in-group bias toward other women, and men have an out-group bias toward women. And yet all we hear about is how bad women have it. Ironically, the only reason anyone even tolerates that constant complaining and bullshit about them being oppressed is precisely because it is UNTRUE. If it were true, nobody would listen to a word of that. You think in the middle east where women are actually somewhat oppressed, that people listen to women complaining about it? Obviously not. The more you hear about that kind of thing in your society, the less true it is.
People need to realize that you aren't living in a conservative world. So even if you want a setup like existed in the past, you can't have it. That's reality. All you're doing is allowing women to have all the benefits of liberal social and political policy, with none of the downsides, and still be protected against everything and treated like princesses. It's like companies who keep their windfalls and socialize their losses through government bailouts. They are experiencing none of the downsides of capitalism and the free market, and all of the upsides. This is what women do through the government as well. No matter what choices they make, even if they choose to get knocked up by some criminal scumbag piece of shit who abandons them, they still take men's tax money through the government to care for themselves. There are no negative consequences for shitty behavior of women. And not even conservatives will acknowledge it. They are more likely to attack the person pointing it out.
So I say, let women face some real consequences for once. This isn't even a real consequence. None of them will actually even be drafted.