More government is good when it balances extreme corporate power.
Extreme corporate power is literally the cause of the government's actions. Socialism does not save us from Keynsianism. Keynsianism is Socialism.
These companies are a) not actually private, and b) extensions of government power. The only way you can cause these companies to actually take a loss, *is to keep them from leeching off of the government's vast stolen wealth.
When that regulation exists to make public corporations into a protected cartel that owns the means of production, which acts at the behest of the state in order to preserve it's power structure, it's socialism.
Extreme corporate power is literally the cause of the government's actions. Socialism does not save us from Keynsianism. Keynsianism is Socialism.
These companies are a) not actually private, and b) extensions of government power. The only way you can cause these companies to actually take a loss, *is to keep them from leeching off of the government's vast stolen wealth.
Regulation is neither socialism nor Keynesianism - an Keynsianism is not socialism.
Regulation is an aspect of Socialism.
Keynsianism is absolutely Socialism.
Socialism is government ownership of the means of production.
Ergo, neither Keynesianism nor Regulation are 'socialism'.
When that regulation exists to make public corporations into a protected cartel that owns the means of production, which acts at the behest of the state in order to preserve it's power structure, it's socialism.