I'm gonna drop some truths here, fite me.
Is loli a form of pedophilia? Yes. It is. Its consumers are terrible people. They are not criminals, in that the law is only concerned with preventing the exploitation of actual children. Our bill of rights is exceptionally permissive of offensive ideas, but simply because we tolerate something to exist does not constitute a moral endorsement.
Lolicons are like people who abuse ritalin. It doesn't make it "not meth" simply because you're not cooking it from Sudafed and batteries.
Nah, if you jack it to pictures of men and you're a man, you're gay, even if they are cartoon men. If you jack it to pictures of children, you're a pedo, even if they are cartoon children. Heal your spiritual sickness; don't feed it.
One problem. People are defined by their actions, not their thoughts.
Actually, no. That's bullshit. Like, sure, if you build a bridge you're a bridge builder and if you don't you aren't, so there are classes of people where inclusion in that class is defined by actions, but what about bridge enthusiasts, you just got to like bridges to be included in this class, so this class is defined by thoughts. So yeah, if you look at diagrams of bridges while jacking your micro-dick you're a pedo- I mean bridge enthusiast.
Actually, yes. That's gold. The reason why people are disgusted by pedophiles is the lasting damage against living, breathing children.
Drawings on a screen or a piece of paper are not real children. Not a single living, breathing child has been touched, groomed or made uncomfortable. The damage is imaginary, non-existent and it only lasts as long as you fixate on it.
No, people are disgusted by pedophiles because they are disgusting and to anyone who isn't spiritually unwell that is obvious.