After an incident where anti-loli false flaggots got an account wrongfully banned for cp, ottman decided to ban loli by making false arguments similar to what 8chan owner jim watkins and gab owner andrew torba made.
Minds userbase is having none of it, and are actively calling ottman out for lying while demanding this decision be reversed.
new edit: ottman is having a meltdown, calling people bots and deleting posts.
edit: the mods need to consider banning the anti-loli spergs on this site for pointless infighting.
If a man likes pornographic art of women, he's straight. If a man likes pornographic art of men, he's gay. If a man likes pornographic art of children, he's a pedophile.
If someone likes killing people in games they like to shoot people irl . And most of the time when an actual pedo is outed it's a smash player, a furry or someone who was attacking anime or loli. Though even if you think it makes someone pedo, unrealistic cartoon art is still a better alternative to keep them away from irl wouldn't it?
I disagree though my second paragraph covers your point
Why stop there? Why not make children wear hats depicting child pornography? I mean if it could stop even one attack against a child, isn't it our duty to wear child porn hats?
Or maybe society shouldn't be built to appease freaks.
That's a stupid argument that makes no sense and you know it.