I can see the headline now, "New bill passed in House that levies extra taxes to men and pays that money directly to women is dis-proportionally unfair against women." Sounds like something the Babylon Bee would say, which means it's soon to be true.
You're too late, they actually did that. Not in America though.
They sued the UK government for "inequality" because the Covid bailouts for women were not "proportional to their inequality in society." - This is while being the majority of those with their jobs protected by furlough, (which they spin as a bad thing) and the majority of the employed by a whopping 0.6% (This is a big number in terms of unemployment, despite how small it appears to be.)
I can see the headline now, "New bill passed in House that levies extra taxes to men and pays that money directly to women is dis-proportionally unfair against women." Sounds like something the Babylon Bee would say, which means it's soon to be true.
You're too late, they actually did that. Not in America though.
They sued the UK government for "inequality" because the Covid bailouts for women were not "proportional to their inequality in society." - This is while being the majority of those with their jobs protected by furlough, (which they spin as a bad thing) and the majority of the employed by a whopping 0.6% (This is a big number in terms of unemployment, despite how small it appears to be.)