The UK unemployment rates, pre-pandemic, used to track fairly close together by gender.
However, recently, during the recovery period, that hasn't stayed true. (4.8/5.4% - F/M) New data will be released in a few days to cover the last month, that may disprove what I'm stating here, but I want to state this hypothesis before that, to see what people think of it.
The Covid-19 pandemic put a lot of people out of work, causing an effective reset of who is employed and who isn't. It gave the opportunity for feminist controlled HR departments to remove people who didn't have certain characteristics. Although the data doesn't separate by race and gender (such as : white males only) so I can't prove this hypothesis, it seems fairly likely, to the point that I would bet on it.
Because of this, I feel that the pandemic has been used to perform a "Great Reset" of sorts, just not the one from the conspiracy theories. Their Great Reset was about removing those who got their job a long time ago and giving the left-wing and mostly female hiring departments the chance to shape the future of employment.
Where does Meghan come in? Well, here's the feminist "Uniparty" standing behind her false accusations in 2019.
My theory is : The Meghan drama will continue developing for a long time, as a distraction from the unemployment figures skewing more and more in women's favor. It's a distraction while her allies continue discriminatory hiring processes in the rebuild.
You're assuming anybody even cares about male unemployment. Sure, the unemployed men do but they'll just be called sexist far-right extremo-racists and nobody is going to dare talk about them.
It's not like this would be the first giant elephant in the room everybody is too afraid to point out.
They do care, just not in the way you think. The Honey Badgers have a video, The Negative Sum Game. In it, Allison describes an experiment in behavioral economics.
The control group was told about a charity, told how many women they helped each year, and were then asked for a donation. The experimental group went through the same procedure, except they were told how many women and men they helped each year. They found that, on average, people donated less when they gave the number of men they helped, despite the number of women helped remaining the same. This would suggest that the value of helping men is not 0, but rather a negative number.
Didn't they have another video where one of them talked about how her boyfriend or husband or whatever got injured and the neighbors were calling him a lazy bastard because he let her do stuff like taking groceries in and garbage out?
Fuck you if it breaks your back the rest of the way, you still gotta do the heavy lifting! We hate standing here watching a poor little woman lift bags!