Superstraight just got banned - Kotaku In Action 2

Superstraight just got banned (media.kotakuinaction2.win)

posted 5 years ago by Wizardslayer 5 years ago by Wizardslayer +83 / -0

73 comments download

73 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (73)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I think you're just skewed because your interactions with them center around that one user

This is incorrect. I only noticed that user because I was already lurking on GC. If they want to fight against SJWs, that is great.

I was always highly suspicious of.

Only because she was a woman. And miraculously, you also hated our other female users, even those who had nothing to do with GC. Just a coincidence.

Their goals are higher than "get transgenders out of our lives", clearly, or they'd just vote Republican and get that one issue secured.

As if Republicans are not worthless on that and all issues.

So, anyone who doesn't like journalists? That's a low bar.

So called journalists are the greatest threat to civilization at the moment.

For a short term prediction, by the end of this year, one of their astroturfing campaigns will have gotten them a win domain.

Wow, really going out on a limb that a group regularly targeted by censorship would acquire a domain on a platform dedicated to opposing censorship.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

They are SJWs. They would have supported Anita, and you know it.

They likely did. Doesn't mean that they can't be useful in other ways. As much as you delude yourself with your tantrums and fantasies of revenge over getting your feewings hurt, you're not going to stop them from being what they are. I'd like to use them against the SJWs. You want the SJWs to win.

I'm not going to put anyone on the spot to prove it, but I haven't been openly hostile to a female user here except when one called me out randomly for opposing GC.

No, I am pretty sure you just brought that up in every response to her, out of the blue, which is why we had to ban you from talking to her.

Didn't the South/North Dakota Senator or whatever pass some bullshit "women's sport is important" bill on March 8th? Republicans, especially Republican women, magically find a spine when it's to help women.

So if this 'helps women', do Democratic women oppose helping women? Or maybe this is pushing back against a dangerous cult.

Articles nobody reads are the greatest threat to humanity?

Yes. Wake up. The lying media sets the agenda, determines (elite) discourse, destroys reputations, and enforces cancel culture.

A group that has their own website and nothing in common with TD. They have zero right to be here.

We have nothing in common with TD other than being censored. Same as them.

They're like cockroaches. For every one you see, there's at least 10 more you haven't.

And you call others genocidal maniacs.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

They haven't done anything to me personally. I stand for those who can't defend themselves because they're too brainwashed, too young or too scared.

Oh please. This is obviously personal. No one is this obsessed with something that does not affect him personally.

I wasn't aware that she was the only female user ever. I swear you said I had bad interactions with every female user, not just Miss GC Plant. (Side note : She disappeared literally as soon as GC had their own site.)

Nah, she was in GG long before GC even was a thing. Can't say the same for you. Also, you at one point bashed Bulba, and she's one of the most beloved users here. Clearly, it's not about GC participation.

No, they just have different opinions of what helps women.

You're all confirmation bias.

Republican wahmen do one thing => they're doing it to help women.
Democratic women do the exact opposite => same.

Democrats are female supremacists who need to keep their intersectional hierarchy focused on the target and therefore will hand them some crumbs at women's expense in the hope they fight for women.

Yeah, the 'crumbs' of being able to assault women at will. Exactly what are actual, real women getting out of this intersectional nonsense? If I were you, and hated women as much as you do, I'd become an intersectionalist, since they get nothing out of it.

In that case, you better start agreeing with me, because the media promoted Valerie Solanas not long ago. Male genocide is the agenda now?

Who likes the NYT?

We hate Democrats.

A lot of GG'ers were Democrats. We hate IDPol and censorship.

I don't want them killed. I just want them and their 20 alts away from places I go.

'Cockroaches' is proto-genocidal rhetoric. Considering that you whine about their comments about men, I've never seen them call men cockroaches.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?