I didn't accuse them. I said that physical strength wouldn't help in that situation.
Congratulations, you managed to think of a situation where your physical strength would not matter. Also: 5'1" wahmen intentionally driving trucks into your Ferrari to kill you. Anything else you can think of in some sort of fever?
Wait, are you saying that celebrating women's latest bullshit commemoration of their self-centered lives doesn't make you feminist? What? No, they chose to commemorate this event, they have to accept the endorsements that it creates.
Retarded virtue-signaling "creates" no endorsements.
That's indisputable, because she literally wrote it down. I didn't include my "paranoid conspiracy theories"
You sound exactly like Stormfags who claim "the Jews" wanted to sterilize all German men, because one wackjob Jew wrote that this should happen. What I want to know is why you recognize the idiocy in one, but not in the other. I like it when you take on those retards. I don't like your competing identitarianism.
That might work on Twitter, but not on a large company's complaint page. I suggested it humorously, but it wouldn't work in real life, they wouldn't click the link for security reasons.
Then you need to make it a link to something they consider a 'reliable' site, which unfortunately includes the BBC.
I'm flattered that you think I have a Ferrari. I have a picture of one as my wallpaper, but I don't have a real one.
Other situations where strength wouldn't matter
A vaccine produced to kill us.
A forced economic crash that pushes us all out of work.
A discrimination based system in the "rebuild" after the pandemic that ensures they always end up on top.
A hysteria-led response to something crazy done by an "incel"
Maybe in your eyes, but in mine it endorses what that movement stands for.
For your analogy to work, there'd have to be massive marches of millions of Jews all waving placards with that quote on it, as well as a massive internet campaign containing it that happens every year, backed by nearly every organization related to Jews.
I still don't think they'd click it. It's common sense not to trust random links.
I just hope that they don't make a commercial with a wahmen or something until you can afford it.
A vaccine produced to kill us.
Please tell me this is what you actually believe. That would at least add some humor to the conversation.
Maybe in your eyes, but in mine it endorses what that movement stands for.
So you just make stuff up, eh? I guess you like postmodernism when it suits you. "I'm just going to interpret your virtue-signaling as a... CALL FOR GENOCIDE".
For your analogy to work, there'd have to be massive marches of millions of Jews all waving placards with that quote on it, as well as a massive internet campaign containing it that happens every year, backed by nearly every organization related to Jews.
Nay, son. You literally cited what one woman said and then conflated it with 3.5 billion women. And there are not hundreds of millions of women (which there would proportionally need to be) attacking our poow, widdle 6'7" TheImpossible.
I still don't think they'd click it. It's common sense not to trust random links.
I think you vastly overestimate the idiots working at such companies.
Not that much. Only when people ask what I'd like to do instead of having a family.
Actually, no. I did at one point (especially when I saw feminist leaning media promote it) but then I thought about it. If it worked and only killed men who took it - that would mean the only people left would be them, and people who despise them.
I don't understand why you don't get this. The feminist movement took their slogan from a paper about genocide, therefore they stand for genocide, therefore the people who support them also stand for genocide.
I cited one paper, connected it with the slogan it created, which they rally behind, then connected that with voting for pro-feminism politics for an obvious majority without even having to take account those who pretend to be same.
Not that much. Only when people ask what I'd like to do instead of having a family.
I think one of those times was me. And another time you said you'd rather drive a Ferrari than waste it on wahmen.
Actually, no. I did at one point (especially when I saw feminist leaning media promote it) but then I thought about it. If it worked and only killed men who took it - that would mean the only people left would be them, and people who despise them.
That explanation for why you don't think it's the case is even better. You do realize that at the very best, less than 1% of the male population mistrusts people just because they're wahmen, right? So it would just be you and the other 1%'ers. Even the 5'1" army could take you out.
BEWARE!
I don't understand why you don't get this. The feminist movement took their slogan from a paper about genocide, therefore they stand for genocide, therefore the people who support them also stand for genocide.
Cause it makes no sense at all? Taking your slogan from a paper about genocide doesn't mean that you support genocide. Nor is virtue-signaling about a history month support for feminism, let alone genocide.
I cited one paper, connected it with the slogan it created, which they rally behind, then connected that with voting for pro-feminism politics for an obvious majority without even having to take account those who pretend to be same.
No person not a potential recruit for the Joker can follow this logical earthwork.
You are in love with using the word 'they', to make sure that you have plausible deniability for your hate-mongering.
Congratulations, you managed to think of a situation where your physical strength would not matter. Also: 5'1" wahmen intentionally driving trucks into your Ferrari to kill you. Anything else you can think of in some sort of fever?
Retarded virtue-signaling "creates" no endorsements.
You sound exactly like Stormfags who claim "the Jews" wanted to sterilize all German men, because one wackjob Jew wrote that this should happen. What I want to know is why you recognize the idiocy in one, but not in the other. I like it when you take on those retards. I don't like your competing identitarianism.
Then you need to make it a link to something they consider a 'reliable' site, which unfortunately includes the BBC.
I'm flattered that you think I have a Ferrari. I have a picture of one as my wallpaper, but I don't have a real one.
Other situations where strength wouldn't matter
A vaccine produced to kill us.
A forced economic crash that pushes us all out of work.
A discrimination based system in the "rebuild" after the pandemic that ensures they always end up on top.
A hysteria-led response to something crazy done by an "incel"
Maybe in your eyes, but in mine it endorses what that movement stands for.
For your analogy to work, there'd have to be massive marches of millions of Jews all waving placards with that quote on it, as well as a massive internet campaign containing it that happens every year, backed by nearly every organization related to Jews.
I still don't think they'd click it. It's common sense not to trust random links.
You talk about getting one all the time.
I just hope that they don't make a commercial with a wahmen or something until you can afford it.
Please tell me this is what you actually believe. That would at least add some humor to the conversation.
So you just make stuff up, eh? I guess you like postmodernism when it suits you. "I'm just going to interpret your virtue-signaling as a... CALL FOR GENOCIDE".
Nay, son. You literally cited what one woman said and then conflated it with 3.5 billion women. And there are not hundreds of millions of women (which there would proportionally need to be) attacking our poow, widdle 6'7" TheImpossible.
I think you vastly overestimate the idiots working at such companies.
Not that much. Only when people ask what I'd like to do instead of having a family.
Actually, no. I did at one point (especially when I saw feminist leaning media promote it) but then I thought about it. If it worked and only killed men who took it - that would mean the only people left would be them, and people who despise them.
I don't understand why you don't get this. The feminist movement took their slogan from a paper about genocide, therefore they stand for genocide, therefore the people who support them also stand for genocide.
I cited one paper, connected it with the slogan it created, which they rally behind, then connected that with voting for pro-feminism politics for an obvious majority without even having to take account those who pretend to be same.
I think one of those times was me. And another time you said you'd rather drive a Ferrari than waste it on wahmen.
That explanation for why you don't think it's the case is even better. You do realize that at the very best, less than 1% of the male population mistrusts people just because they're wahmen, right? So it would just be you and the other 1%'ers. Even the 5'1" army could take you out.
BEWARE!
Cause it makes no sense at all? Taking your slogan from a paper about genocide doesn't mean that you support genocide. Nor is virtue-signaling about a history month support for feminism, let alone genocide.
No person not a potential recruit for the Joker can follow this logical earthwork.
You are in love with using the word 'they', to make sure that you have plausible deniability for your hate-mongering.