Not that much. Only when people ask what I'd like to do instead of having a family.
Actually, no. I did at one point (especially when I saw feminist leaning media promote it) but then I thought about it. If it worked and only killed men who took it - that would mean the only people left would be them, and people who despise them.
I don't understand why you don't get this. The feminist movement took their slogan from a paper about genocide, therefore they stand for genocide, therefore the people who support them also stand for genocide.
I cited one paper, connected it with the slogan it created, which they rally behind, then connected that with voting for pro-feminism politics for an obvious majority without even having to take account those who pretend to be same.
Not that much. Only when people ask what I'd like to do instead of having a family.
I think one of those times was me. And another time you said you'd rather drive a Ferrari than waste it on wahmen.
Actually, no. I did at one point (especially when I saw feminist leaning media promote it) but then I thought about it. If it worked and only killed men who took it - that would mean the only people left would be them, and people who despise them.
That explanation for why you don't think it's the case is even better. You do realize that at the very best, less than 1% of the male population mistrusts people just because they're wahmen, right? So it would just be you and the other 1%'ers. Even the 5'1" army could take you out.
BEWARE!
I don't understand why you don't get this. The feminist movement took their slogan from a paper about genocide, therefore they stand for genocide, therefore the people who support them also stand for genocide.
Cause it makes no sense at all? Taking your slogan from a paper about genocide doesn't mean that you support genocide. Nor is virtue-signaling about a history month support for feminism, let alone genocide.
I cited one paper, connected it with the slogan it created, which they rally behind, then connected that with voting for pro-feminism politics for an obvious majority without even having to take account those who pretend to be same.
No person not a potential recruit for the Joker can follow this logical earthwork.
You are in love with using the word 'they', to make sure that you have plausible deniability for your hate-mongering.
You forgot to include the other groups that will refuse it.
"I'm creating a new political party - "The National Socialist Worker's Party" - and no, of course I'm not anti-Semitic, why would you think that?" - same logic.
There's an academic paper that states plans to reduce the male population. The title of it became the feminist slogan. Those who vote for feminist policy give endorsement to this plan.
Remember that you will die. You'll be beneath the ground, rotting. And no one will remember that you ever existed. You'll have no legacy. Your genes are a dead end. Seems pretty depressing, even if you did spend your brief and miserable time on earth driving a red car.
You forgot to include the other groups that will refuse it.
Radical Islam? But you told me they're just stooges for the wahmen, even as they abuse tens of thousands of women and nothing happens to them.
"I'm creating a new political party - "The National Socialist Worker's Party" - and no, of course I'm not anti-Semitic, why would you think that?" - same logic.
So your defense is the Antifa defense, namely that the name determines everything. If it says antifa, it must be anti-fascist.
There's an academic paper that states plans to reduce the male population. The title of it became the feminist slogan.
"The" feminist slogan? The personal is political?
Those who vote for feminist policy give endorsement to this plan.
Most people who vote for feminist policy are blissfully unaware of any such thing, you dummy.
Why would I care what happens after I die? I won't know any of it.
I was thinking more the "great reset"/Q/conspiracy theorist types. Remind me who Islamists vote for? The moment they start making moves towards power will be when they get jettisoned.
Not exactly, but if you're naming your organization/movement after something evil, it doesn't exactly look innocent.
Not that much. Only when people ask what I'd like to do instead of having a family.
Actually, no. I did at one point (especially when I saw feminist leaning media promote it) but then I thought about it. If it worked and only killed men who took it - that would mean the only people left would be them, and people who despise them.
I don't understand why you don't get this. The feminist movement took their slogan from a paper about genocide, therefore they stand for genocide, therefore the people who support them also stand for genocide.
I cited one paper, connected it with the slogan it created, which they rally behind, then connected that with voting for pro-feminism politics for an obvious majority without even having to take account those who pretend to be same.
I think one of those times was me. And another time you said you'd rather drive a Ferrari than waste it on wahmen.
That explanation for why you don't think it's the case is even better. You do realize that at the very best, less than 1% of the male population mistrusts people just because they're wahmen, right? So it would just be you and the other 1%'ers. Even the 5'1" army could take you out.
BEWARE!
Cause it makes no sense at all? Taking your slogan from a paper about genocide doesn't mean that you support genocide. Nor is virtue-signaling about a history month support for feminism, let alone genocide.
No person not a potential recruit for the Joker can follow this logical earthwork.
You are in love with using the word 'they', to make sure that you have plausible deniability for your hate-mongering.
Probably. It's a nice aspirational goal.
You forgot to include the other groups that will refuse it.
"I'm creating a new political party - "The National Socialist Worker's Party" - and no, of course I'm not anti-Semitic, why would you think that?" - same logic.
There's an academic paper that states plans to reduce the male population. The title of it became the feminist slogan. Those who vote for feminist policy give endorsement to this plan.
Remember that you will die. You'll be beneath the ground, rotting. And no one will remember that you ever existed. You'll have no legacy. Your genes are a dead end. Seems pretty depressing, even if you did spend your brief and miserable time on earth driving a red car.
Radical Islam? But you told me they're just stooges for the wahmen, even as they abuse tens of thousands of women and nothing happens to them.
So your defense is the Antifa defense, namely that the name determines everything. If it says antifa, it must be anti-fascist.
"The" feminist slogan? The personal is political?
Most people who vote for feminist policy are blissfully unaware of any such thing, you dummy.
Why would I care what happens after I die? I won't know any of it.
I was thinking more the "great reset"/Q/conspiracy theorist types. Remind me who Islamists vote for? The moment they start making moves towards power will be when they get jettisoned.
Not exactly, but if you're naming your organization/movement after something evil, it doesn't exactly look innocent.
"The Future is Female"
You think/hope.
Are comment thread lengths limited here?