Why the fuck are the glowies now going after incels? - Kotaku In Action 2

Why the fuck are the glowies now going after incels? (archive.is)

posted 5 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor 5 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor +45 / -0

52 comments

52 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (52)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

No, I said that women's badly raised children killing people isn't because of the sin of maleness

So you disputed a point that I didn't make, eh? Maybe they need a father in the home. Perhaps wahmen can be blamed for that as well. Work at it!

You're the one spewing absurdities like a woman would.

Breaking news: TheImpossible1 discovers that not only women can "spew absurdities"

I'm honestly beginning to wonder if you're truly insane, and not just damaged.

Technically, calling them out would be justifiable if the percentage that hated us was above 50.

No, even if 50.1% of white people were racist, that still would not justify hating on all white people. In fact, it would make it all the more inexcusable to hate on the 49.9% who resisted the groupthink. Same for women.

What a woman did to benefit a group led by a woman, from a country whose healthcare is led by a woman, where women's hatred informs the majority of public policy...

Shorter you: wahmen wahmen wahmen wahmen wahmen.

Nowhere explained: how one woman's action justifies your hatred of women in general.

Well, it's their fault regardless

That's basically you in a nutshell. You've even stooped so low as to blame people's mother for crime. Apparently, people don't have fathers.

Because I want to survive their sick plans. I'll find somewhere.

Oh, you'll find a place where women are not the majority? Good luck. Perhaps some Asian countries where female infanticide is common, which I'm sure you'll find some way to blame on wahmen.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I mean, yeah. Pretty easily. Nobody runs away from a child they wanted to have unless the woman chases them off with how awful she is.

So... only women can be awful. A man would never, ever refuse to take responsibility for his offspring.

Amazing.

I think I've just lost too much to their agenda and now I see my freedoms are next. I can't exactly have good opinions of people who are doing that.

Or even hate the people who actually did that. You have to hate half the human population, which just guarantees that you will lose whatever freedoms that you retain. Because rest assured if it's a choice between your BS and feminism, nearly all women and the vast majority of men will choose feminism. How about toning down your BS and engaging in some rational thinking instead?

I really don't think women of the age where they aren't feminist will ever stumble upon what I have to say, or care if they do. They're generally old enough to be in a home.

"I am right to smear these people, because they won't find out about it."

Also, so everyone above 65 is not a feminist, and everyone under that age is. Interesting. Nice attempt to exonerate yourself from what you are doing, which is being feminism's best friend. They would put you on air if they could, because if your BS were exposed to a wider audience, you would be a walking advertisement for feminism.

I did explain, multiple times. Their own ideology says to pretend to be good people up until the time that you have the power you need.

Nice self-sealing conspiracy theory that removes from you any need to offer... proof.

Well, yeah. Most murderers and rapists don't.

But for some reason, the parent who abandon their kids are blameless, but the woman who struggle against all odds to raise a kid in a single parent household is to blame for everything.

I wonder why.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– deleted 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Well, baby trapping isn't exactly uncommon.

OK, so no man would ever, ever walk away from his responsibilities, but when those of the 0% who do, it's the fault of the wahmen.

You seem to be way too lenient with attributing motivations - would you really stay with a woman you dislike because she tricked you into it by lying about birth control or tampering with yours?

Of course not. I do think it's crazy to think that this makes up anything more than an infinitesimal percentage of single parent homes.

I don't really think so. By the end of all this, even the blind will see what's going on.

You think that not only men will start agreeing with your "all women deserve to be hated", but women as well? Otherwise, you'll lose no matter what. Which is guaranteed with your BS.

I wish they would put me on air. I'd destroy their image permanently with just 20 minutes of public attention. I wouldn't even need to go into conspiracies, I'd just quote their own words. By the end they'd be society's pariahs like Klan members.

As delusional as I expected. What would actually happen is that you would make a complete fool of yourself. You'd cite some obscure feminazi, and then the other people would say: "well, I'm a feminist, and I don't agree with that". And then you're blown out of the water.

How many women have appeared sane until they got into power?

Boris Johnson?

Baby trapping should be a crime.

Why so lenient? A wahmen existing should be a crime.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?