In a parallel universe, you're a feminist spamming every case of a man killing his daughter claiming that he wouldn't have done this if she were his son.
Even if that were the case, and you have not demonstrated it, that would not show that this case would be explained by your evergreen pet explanation. Nor would correlation prove causation.
I am amazed by how outraged you are by murders when the perpetrators are women. I'm glad you're not looking at the male-on-female murder rate, because that would puncture your narrative quicker than a BLM supporter taking a glance on the black-on-white crime rate.
Would she have still done it if the child was a daughter?
Boyfriend excuse is burying the lead, there's always an uptick of female on male murders around IWD.
In a parallel universe, you're a feminist spamming every case of a man killing his daughter claiming that he wouldn't have done this if she were his son.
Even if that were the case, and you have not demonstrated it, that would not show that this case would be explained by your evergreen pet explanation. Nor would correlation prove causation.
I am amazed by how outraged you are by murders when the perpetrators are women. I'm glad you're not looking at the male-on-female murder rate, because that would puncture your narrative quicker than a BLM supporter taking a glance on the black-on-white crime rate.
Certainly true in infanticide at least. Not sure about older children.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26638075?seq=6#metadata_info_tab_contents
Page 6
Holy based. Just remove the word infant and you'll work out the motive behind everything they've ever done or will do.
in/out group thinking is pretty much the rosetta stone for understanding people imo
lede