Second impeachment, it was a Republican woman who fabricated "evidence" to try and make it work. I overestimated their willingness to do the wrong thing the first time.
Who doesn't? There's a reason a country with frequent terrorist "incidents" doesn't elect a right wing government and that reason is her. A useless politician with absolutely insane economic plans running off the brand recognition from her father.
I'd prefer not to answer this, but...probably not? I don't trust any female politicians, I don't like celebrities, I don't watch porn, I think female sport is stupid...
I knew you'd say that. You did not predict it about the second impeachment, you made the claim about the first impeachment. You were crowing for a long time that you knew for sure that the WAHMEN would vote against Trump. Of course, you never mentioned the wahmen who strongly supported Trump, only the two you thought might not. When you turned out to be wrong, as usual, we never heard another peep about it, unless I brought it up to your annoyance.
There's a reason a country with frequent terrorist "incidents" doesn't elect a right wing government and that reason is her. A useless politician with absolutely insane economic plans running off the brand recognition from her father.
Except that those "insane economic plans" are very popular in France, where the median voter is socially conservative and pro-big government. She got far more votes than her father.
I'd prefer not to answer this, but...probably not?
Props for always remaining calm and civil. Can't same the same for myself.
I don't trust any female politicians
The scary thing is the idea that you might trust male politicians. Politicians are axiomatically untrustworthy. But not because they're wahmen. It baffles me that you would think otherwise.
But you can't deny that the second impeachment did go as I said the first one would. She went way above and beyond the level of TDS expected. Also, remember that bizarre "God herself" speech from Swalwell? That was extremely strange.
French people are stupider than I thought. Even I can see her economic plans are terribly thought out and I'm not French. She got more votes because the party became more mainstream, but if she wasn't a Le Pen, she'd be a nobody and Macron would be back to repressing his memories of being molested by his wife as a small child because he would have lost that election.
That's true. Remember when you kind of lost it?
I don't trust male politicians either, but I just have an extra level of distrust in female politicians because of that possibility that they're feminist plants. Not to say men can't be..just look at Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.
But you can't deny that the second impeachment did go as I said the first one would
You didn't make your claims about the second impeachment. What's more, you predicted that only wahmen would vote against Trump. Turns out a good number of non-wahmen humans did during the second impeachment as well. I note that you didn't spend nearly as much complaining about that rat Romney as you did about the wahmen though.
Also, remember that bizarre "God herself" speech from Swalwell?
I had better things to do.
French people are stupider than I thought. Even I can see her economic plans are terribly thought out and I'm not French.
The French simply disagree with you. Some French economic policies are objectively bad, kept in place by threats from overly powerful unions, while others are a question of trade-offs.
She got more votes because the party became more mainstream, but if she wasn't a Le Pen, she'd be a nobody
She's far more competent than her useless father. There is only one thing preventing you from acknowledging that, and that's very sad.
That's true. Remember when you kind of lost it?
Actually, no. But I don't claim to have been civil to you, while you have almost always retorted in a civil manner.
I don't trust male politicians either, but I just have an extra level of distrust in female politicians because of that possibility that they're feminist plants. Not to say men can't be..just look at Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.
I really don't see the difference. At best, it's slightly more likely that a given wahmen is a feminist than a given man.
Democrats were a given. Also, Romney personally hates Trump, probably because he lost his election while Trump won...twice.
Don't blame you. I went really deep down the rabbit hole and wrote a long post about it but I shelved it for sounding way too tinfoil. TL;DR : There were reasons to believe that the Democrats worship Lilith, like those pathetic witch LARPing feminists. Lilith is regarded by them as the goddess of female independence. There was way more to it but it was too much of a tinfoil theory with barely there connections that required extensive knowledge of feminist doctrine that I don't believe every Democrat would be taught.
Sounds about right, with all the jokes of Frenchmen on strike.
A competent person would have beaten the mommy's boy.
True, I try to be more civil because of the nature of what I talk about. Similar to why I don't tend to use things that can be misconstrued as calls to violence. Although with all the restrictions they're putting on those who don't get vaccinated, even I am getting a bit concerned that a non-violent fightback is off the cards.
Slightly? That's the understatement of the century.
Second impeachment, it was a Republican woman who fabricated "evidence" to try and make it work. I overestimated their willingness to do the wrong thing the first time.
Who doesn't? There's a reason a country with frequent terrorist "incidents" doesn't elect a right wing government and that reason is her. A useless politician with absolutely insane economic plans running off the brand recognition from her father.
I'd prefer not to answer this, but...probably not? I don't trust any female politicians, I don't like celebrities, I don't watch porn, I think female sport is stupid...
I knew you'd say that. You did not predict it about the second impeachment, you made the claim about the first impeachment. You were crowing for a long time that you knew for sure that the WAHMEN would vote against Trump. Of course, you never mentioned the wahmen who strongly supported Trump, only the two you thought might not. When you turned out to be wrong, as usual, we never heard another peep about it, unless I brought it up to your annoyance.
Except that those "insane economic plans" are very popular in France, where the median voter is socially conservative and pro-big government. She got far more votes than her father.
Props for always remaining calm and civil. Can't same the same for myself.
The scary thing is the idea that you might trust male politicians. Politicians are axiomatically untrustworthy. But not because they're wahmen. It baffles me that you would think otherwise.
But you can't deny that the second impeachment did go as I said the first one would. She went way above and beyond the level of TDS expected. Also, remember that bizarre "God herself" speech from Swalwell? That was extremely strange.
French people are stupider than I thought. Even I can see her economic plans are terribly thought out and I'm not French. She got more votes because the party became more mainstream, but if she wasn't a Le Pen, she'd be a nobody and Macron would be back to repressing his memories of being molested by his wife as a small child because he would have lost that election.
That's true. Remember when you kind of lost it?
I don't trust male politicians either, but I just have an extra level of distrust in female politicians because of that possibility that they're feminist plants. Not to say men can't be..just look at Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.
You didn't make your claims about the second impeachment. What's more, you predicted that only wahmen would vote against Trump. Turns out a good number of non-wahmen humans did during the second impeachment as well. I note that you didn't spend nearly as much complaining about that rat Romney as you did about the wahmen though.
I had better things to do.
The French simply disagree with you. Some French economic policies are objectively bad, kept in place by threats from overly powerful unions, while others are a question of trade-offs.
She's far more competent than her useless father. There is only one thing preventing you from acknowledging that, and that's very sad.
Actually, no. But I don't claim to have been civil to you, while you have almost always retorted in a civil manner.
I really don't see the difference. At best, it's slightly more likely that a given wahmen is a feminist than a given man.
Democrats were a given. Also, Romney personally hates Trump, probably because he lost his election while Trump won...twice.
Don't blame you. I went really deep down the rabbit hole and wrote a long post about it but I shelved it for sounding way too tinfoil. TL;DR : There were reasons to believe that the Democrats worship Lilith, like those pathetic witch LARPing feminists. Lilith is regarded by them as the goddess of female independence. There was way more to it but it was too much of a tinfoil theory with barely there connections that required extensive knowledge of feminist doctrine that I don't believe every Democrat would be taught.
Sounds about right, with all the jokes of Frenchmen on strike.
A competent person would have beaten the mommy's boy.
True, I try to be more civil because of the nature of what I talk about. Similar to why I don't tend to use things that can be misconstrued as calls to violence. Although with all the restrictions they're putting on those who don't get vaccinated, even I am getting a bit concerned that a non-violent fightback is off the cards.
Slightly? That's the understatement of the century.