I knew you'd say that. You did not predict it about the second impeachment, you made the claim about the first impeachment. You were crowing for a long time that you knew for sure that the WAHMEN would vote against Trump. Of course, you never mentioned the wahmen who strongly supported Trump, only the two you thought might not. When you turned out to be wrong, as usual, we never heard another peep about it, unless I brought it up to your annoyance.
There's a reason a country with frequent terrorist "incidents" doesn't elect a right wing government and that reason is her. A useless politician with absolutely insane economic plans running off the brand recognition from her father.
Except that those "insane economic plans" are very popular in France, where the median voter is socially conservative and pro-big government. She got far more votes than her father.
I'd prefer not to answer this, but...probably not?
Props for always remaining calm and civil. Can't same the same for myself.
I don't trust any female politicians
The scary thing is the idea that you might trust male politicians. Politicians are axiomatically untrustworthy. But not because they're wahmen. It baffles me that you would think otherwise.
But you can't deny that the second impeachment did go as I said the first one would
You didn't make your claims about the second impeachment. What's more, you predicted that only wahmen would vote against Trump. Turns out a good number of non-wahmen humans did during the second impeachment as well. I note that you didn't spend nearly as much complaining about that rat Romney as you did about the wahmen though.
Also, remember that bizarre "God herself" speech from Swalwell?
I had better things to do.
French people are stupider than I thought. Even I can see her economic plans are terribly thought out and I'm not French.
The French simply disagree with you. Some French economic policies are objectively bad, kept in place by threats from overly powerful unions, while others are a question of trade-offs.
She got more votes because the party became more mainstream, but if she wasn't a Le Pen, she'd be a nobody
She's far more competent than her useless father. There is only one thing preventing you from acknowledging that, and that's very sad.
That's true. Remember when you kind of lost it?
Actually, no. But I don't claim to have been civil to you, while you have almost always retorted in a civil manner.
I don't trust male politicians either, but I just have an extra level of distrust in female politicians because of that possibility that they're feminist plants. Not to say men can't be..just look at Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.
I really don't see the difference. At best, it's slightly more likely that a given wahmen is a feminist than a given man.
I knew you'd say that. You did not predict it about the second impeachment, you made the claim about the first impeachment. You were crowing for a long time that you knew for sure that the WAHMEN would vote against Trump. Of course, you never mentioned the wahmen who strongly supported Trump, only the two you thought might not. When you turned out to be wrong, as usual, we never heard another peep about it, unless I brought it up to your annoyance.
Except that those "insane economic plans" are very popular in France, where the median voter is socially conservative and pro-big government. She got far more votes than her father.
Props for always remaining calm and civil. Can't same the same for myself.
The scary thing is the idea that you might trust male politicians. Politicians are axiomatically untrustworthy. But not because they're wahmen. It baffles me that you would think otherwise.
You didn't make your claims about the second impeachment. What's more, you predicted that only wahmen would vote against Trump. Turns out a good number of non-wahmen humans did during the second impeachment as well. I note that you didn't spend nearly as much complaining about that rat Romney as you did about the wahmen though.
I had better things to do.
The French simply disagree with you. Some French economic policies are objectively bad, kept in place by threats from overly powerful unions, while others are a question of trade-offs.
She's far more competent than her useless father. There is only one thing preventing you from acknowledging that, and that's very sad.
Actually, no. But I don't claim to have been civil to you, while you have almost always retorted in a civil manner.
I really don't see the difference. At best, it's slightly more likely that a given wahmen is a feminist than a given man.