I said 'hypothetical'. Do you not understand the word?
Something tells me that you don't want to answer, because the answer is that even if the numbers were equal, you'd still be whinging non-stop about 'wahmen'.
I guess you realize it would make you look bad if you did answer, that it then becomes clear that it's not about ideology, but just about hating wahmen.
Incredible how you manage to not grasp the simplest of things. For a hypothetical, it's not necessary for them to not be the majority. But you clearly desperately want to avoid admitting that your hate campaign against women has nothing at all to do with feminism, because from your unwillingness to answer, it is clear that the answer would be that you would still be hating on them if the majority of feminists were men.
I said 'hypothetical'. Do you not understand the word?
Something tells me that you don't want to answer, because the answer is that even if the numbers were equal, you'd still be whinging non-stop about 'wahmen'.
I don't see the point in answering something that relies on a hypothesis so fictional it makes "patriarchy" seem real.
So you don't know the meaning of the word.
I guess you realize it would make you look bad if you did answer, that it then becomes clear that it's not about ideology, but just about hating wahmen.
There's a difference between a hypothetical and a stupid deflection.
There's no possible way that they aren't the majority.
Incredible how you manage to not grasp the simplest of things. For a hypothetical, it's not necessary for them to not be the majority. But you clearly desperately want to avoid admitting that your hate campaign against women has nothing at all to do with feminism, because from your unwillingness to answer, it is clear that the answer would be that you would still be hating on them if the majority of feminists were men.
That is answer enough.