Incredible how you manage to not grasp the simplest of things. For a hypothetical, it's not necessary for them to not be the majority. But you clearly desperately want to avoid admitting that your hate campaign against women has nothing at all to do with feminism, because from your unwillingness to answer, it is clear that the answer would be that you would still be hating on them if the majority of feminists were men.
Incredible how you manage to not grasp the simplest of things. For a hypothetical, it's not necessary for them to not be the majority. But you clearly desperately want to avoid admitting that your hate campaign against women has nothing at all to do with feminism, because from your unwillingness to answer, it is clear that the answer would be that you would still be hating on them if the majority of feminists were men.
That is answer enough.
That's not what I'm saying - I'm saying that the hypothetical is so off from reality that it's not worth my time answering it.
It's not worth your time to say 'yes' or 'no', but it is worth your time to spend 30x times as much ostentatiously refusing to answer?
It's clear why.
I'd have to explain my yes or no answer. It's easier to just keep saying that the question is flawed, because it is.
No, don't explain, just give me the yes or no.
You don't want to answer because it will make you look bad.