Not really, no. Antisemitism continues to exist because people who are solely focused on one specific group are easy to manipulate to no end. Their actions are predictable beyond measure, and are a wonderful form of controlled opposition.
Agreed. But a European has no more business being ruled by a Jew than an African has being ruled by a European. Incompatibility leads to conflict. It's natural. Inequality will always exist, but the greater the diversity, the greater the inequality.
Let Jews pilfer fellow Jews. Let Africans murder fellow Africans.
Inequality will always exist, but the greater the diversity, the greater the inequality.
That shit just don't make no sense.
You're still abiding to a Leftist philosophy that Inequality and Diversity have a causal relationship. They don't. Inequality exists everywhere in all things because nothing is equal. Neither homogeneity nor diversity change that. Inequality will either continue to occur among "homogenous" groups, or it will emerge regardless.
But a European has no more business being ruled by a Jew than an African has being ruled by a European. Incompatibility leads to conflict.
Why? Incompatibility doesn't originate from a geographic stance. I would not claim that an Afrikaans could not be president of the US, nor would I claim that a Portuguese man couldn't be in charge of the Congo, nor would I claim that Mongol couldn't rule Japan.
Incompatibility of culture comes from... culture. Culture is not sufficiently influenced enough by geography to be a determining factor of culture on a single individual's place of birth. Not unless that person's life an culture is intertwined with geography. And even then, this doesn't necessarily carry over to any sort of established system of power.
Not really, no. Antisemitism continues to exist because people who are solely focused on one specific group are easy to manipulate to no end. Their actions are predictable beyond measure, and are a wonderful form of controlled opposition.
No, not really. It's because that one group stands out in many of the worst ways. They're the 13/50 of finance, academia, media, and policy.
Inequality exists and can't be eliminated. Disparity is not caused by discrimination.
Agreed. But a European has no more business being ruled by a Jew than an African has being ruled by a European. Incompatibility leads to conflict. It's natural. Inequality will always exist, but the greater the diversity, the greater the inequality.
Let Jews pilfer fellow Jews. Let Africans murder fellow Africans.
That shit just don't make no sense.
You're still abiding to a Leftist philosophy that Inequality and Diversity have a causal relationship. They don't. Inequality exists everywhere in all things because nothing is equal. Neither homogeneity nor diversity change that. Inequality will either continue to occur among "homogenous" groups, or it will emerge regardless.
Why? Incompatibility doesn't originate from a geographic stance. I would not claim that an Afrikaans could not be president of the US, nor would I claim that a Portuguese man couldn't be in charge of the Congo, nor would I claim that Mongol couldn't rule Japan.
Incompatibility of culture comes from... culture. Culture is not sufficiently influenced enough by geography to be a determining factor of culture on a single individual's place of birth. Not unless that person's life an culture is intertwined with geography. And even then, this doesn't necessarily carry over to any sort of established system of power.