I'm going to keep this somewhat brief and simple so as to make sure the point is understood.
What is fiat, and why is it important to understand?
"Fiat" refers to a certain top level monetary basis whereby the value of currency is based around for lack of a better word, confidence. Also know as speculation.
First, let's look at what fiat ISN'T.
In ye olden days currency was backed by physical or specific quantities. It varied from gold and silver, to gunpowder, even so abstract as physical labor hours. Whatever it was backed by, it was backed by some specific and quantifiable asset.
The simplest version was of course the gold standard.
1$ = 1oz of gold. (Not a real exchange, just an example.)
What this meant was that the government acted as a guarantor for the mercantilism of its citizens. Money is issued into circulation as backed by proportional physical assets of a nation or state. The wealth of a nation was decided quite literally by the projection of their economic might.
It's not quite so simple, but that's the basic idea.
So what's that whole fiat thing then? What does this matter? Wtf are you talking about?
The reason WSB is called Wall Street Bets is right in the name. Our financial markets have become glorified casinos. However, it's so, so much worse. Those in charge of the markets: The Federal Reserve, Wall Street, deep rooted pseudonational conglomerates; they are the House, and the House always wins.
Value is created or destroyed out of thin air as it benefits those in control of the system.
When the FED prints a trillion dollars to feed and inflate the market, where do you think that that value comes from?
They're betting against the common folk. They're betting against your potential. Shaving away an ounce of flesh to indulge their excess.
I say it so flamboyantly because there is no value there. It's all fake. An illusion. It's a house of cards that stands only as long it's safely tucked away out of sight.
Every dollar you own is only as valuable as the confidence in the system that issues it.
That statement is the reason why the Great Depression happened.
The problem of Bitcoin
So Bitcoin. What does that have to do with anything?
Bitcoin is a fiat currency.
The value is entirely codependent on a system of confidence in the system itself having value.
If that sounds like a tautology that's because it is a tautology.
Bitcoin has been shooting up in value over the past few years. "Bitcoin is the future!" people say. Sure. Maybe. But what do you think changes?
That it has grown so fast and continues to grow to excessive proportions should terrify you. What that means is that it's taking the confidence that was once given to other fiat currency. It's not some cycle of infinite growth.
Should Bitcoin grow to eclipse other currencies it will become a captured asset under a centralized system. It was created entirely to replace national fiat for an international fiat. Those who control the exchanges will control the financial foundation.
How many bitcoins are there total? How many are held out of circulation? Who do you think is buying them to support such a massive growth of valuation? What happens in 20 years when the global banking apparatus owns the majority of bitcoin as well as the major exchanges?
Be warned.
You hear about things like the "Great Reset" a lot these days. Be aware that these plans have been underway since before most of your were born. Bitcoin is not something outside of that plan.
We either end fiat-based policy or we continue to live as slaves.
We've been on fiat currency since paper currency and fractional reserve banking, the infinite money printer, was invented 100s of years ago.
National or international fiat, central banks are still outside of your control.
The US Federal Reserve just printed $5 trillion in 2020, to cover the coof-induced stock collapse. $3 trillion went to elites and not the wagies. National or international fiat, it's the same shit.
Since I'm not on crypto, the real vulnerability in the tech is when someone owns 51% of bitcoins, then they control the currency or something.
They can stop transactions from happening with 51% of mining, but this won't be a problem until after the first time it happens. Wallets could be effectively frozen. The ledger can easily be forked once in a crisis like that, then the powerful people will start trying to force and manipulate forks.
We might even see a 'Currency War' in the future as individual crypto innovators try and keep ahead of hostile takeovers by globalists.
What will you do if the system itself was from the beginning created by those globalists? If from the start it was always under their control?
I mean if you're asking me if I like the idea that shadowy figures can control my finances I'd say fuck no. But the dollar already functions as a semi-global currency anyway, at least while it is still solvent. Why is it used in movies as the cash transfer? Why is it that I can bet with reasonable certainty that a store or cab in another country will take my dollar? So what should I care that globalists are buying into crypto? It just means we have to combat the same issues we have now. I'm personally more concerned about being able to track my transactions, but coins with that kind of encryption exist now or are being developed.
If I want my own currency that I control and can trade with for the apocalypse its guns and ammo, medicines, and food and water.
Not exactly.
With nationalization of banks there is potential for a reclamation and reformation of the currency.
It's happened twice in the US already. That's why what we have now is a second version of the FED.
Not really.
You don't need to control a majority of something to influence it. Especially in a highly distributed system.
Let's say an individual controls 20% and the next highest ownership is 5%. The rest is highly fractured between many owners.
This might imply that if the masses then collectivize under some singular social hegemony they'd have the ability to direct the flow of the system. In reality such a thing doesn't happen and the majority of the output of effort is captured in artificial campaigns.
You can already see that effect in current structures. This will only be made worse in global hegemonistic control schemes that have been and will continue to be orchestrated.