I saw a "fact check" about this "There is no evidence that antifa led riot" or something like that. The easiest way to lie is to take true thing that opponents are saying, tweak it just enough to be technically untrue and then deboonk that instead.
The fact checkers claimed that a woman who was literally sent to prison for a terrorist bombing wasn't necessarily a terrorist because no one can agree on the definition of terrorism. Anyone who quotes a fact checker is an idiot.
They decide what makes evidence. Anonymous hearsay (e.g. "the whistleblower") in their favor is damning evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Video evidence of a crime that goes against them? No grounds for evidence and not admissible.
I saw a "fact check" about this "There is no evidence that antifa led riot" or something like that. The easiest way to lie is to take true thing that opponents are saying, tweak it just enough to be technically untrue and then deboonk that instead.
The fact checkers claimed that a woman who was literally sent to prison for a terrorist bombing wasn't necessarily a terrorist because no one can agree on the definition of terrorism. Anyone who quotes a fact checker is an idiot.
Fuck the corrupt leftist fact checkers.
We have proof now that Antifa members, BLM members and CNN employees themselves were at this event trying to incite protesters to commit violence.
She's a freelancer, not an employee.
They decide what makes evidence. Anonymous hearsay (e.g. "the whistleblower") in their favor is damning evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Video evidence of a crime that goes against them? No grounds for evidence and not admissible.