It's not hypocrisy or even moral cowardice. It's simple tactics.
The Left is fully defined through a philosophy of war. Holding a moral position is choosing to make yourself a stationary target. "This is horrifying" is what they say when they see an injured police officer when it advantages them.
Think about what they say about people who charge police with knives. Hell, Kamalla was just defending it today.
Now, think tactically about what they will say about the woman who was shot by Capitol police today? Not "what is the moral position here?", think: "What kind of narrative would allow me the most power over someone else?" Then, go look it up. You'll see you're correct.
The Left is fully defined through a philosophy of war
It's incredible because the useful idiots and cultural footsoldiers used by them are characterized by a belief that there's an excess of everything to go around. "There's no need for border controls and a compensatory meritocracy, there's plenty to go around for everyone and no evil people exist to abuse the open ended rules and sweeping centralized authority we'll create" Then they go right along and follow the most bloodthirsty organization around, people fighting tooth and nail not to share even a drop of wealth or power with anyone else unless they absolutely have to, all because their words still say "yes, you're right ?" all whilst their actions say "haha, fucking chumps, this is a war for survival".
That's exactly the problem. They think you're stupid and weak if you're not trying to win a fight. All the nonsense about co-operation is a lie. They just want an ally they can use to gain more power, and to stab in the back later as a rung on the ladder to success.
It's not hypocrisy or even moral cowardice. It's simple tactics.
The Left is fully defined through a philosophy of war. Holding a moral position is choosing to make yourself a stationary target. "This is horrifying" is what they say when they see an injured police officer when it advantages them.
Think about what they say about people who charge police with knives. Hell, Kamalla was just defending it today.
Now, think tactically about what they will say about the woman who was shot by Capitol police today? Not "what is the moral position here?", think: "What kind of narrative would allow me the most power over someone else?" Then, go look it up. You'll see you're correct.
It's incredible because the useful idiots and cultural footsoldiers used by them are characterized by a belief that there's an excess of everything to go around. "There's no need for border controls and a compensatory meritocracy, there's plenty to go around for everyone and no evil people exist to abuse the open ended rules and sweeping centralized authority we'll create" Then they go right along and follow the most bloodthirsty organization around, people fighting tooth and nail not to share even a drop of wealth or power with anyone else unless they absolutely have to, all because their words still say "yes, you're right ?" all whilst their actions say "haha, fucking chumps, this is a war for survival".
That's exactly the problem. They think you're stupid and weak if you're not trying to win a fight. All the nonsense about co-operation is a lie. They just want an ally they can use to gain more power, and to stab in the back later as a rung on the ladder to success.