/b/ is literally filled with sissies writing about this. I don't know why it surprises anyone. Women aren't self aware enough to be this open about it, but it works plenty on them too.
They all see themselves are noble, virtuous people with shameful kinky sides who long to be exploited by larger, more brutish evil men. Its why women fucked conquerors throughout history, its why BLACKED porn is literally a major category as is rapey everything in women's smut novels.
All this does is show whoever wrote this, likely a sissy loser of some sort, sees the world in incredibly simple stereotypes.
Sexual Selection for women will always favor those who are capable of protecting them, even if other aspects may be unattractive. The link between sex and violence is that women want to make sure men's violence can be used to protect them, and by extension their family.
I think you're going a little far about women being fucked by conquerors. It was not like women were looking to watch their homes get burned, their husbands/brothers/fathers get murdered, themselves get raped, and they and their children sold into slavery. That repeatedly happened in many conquests. It was not a positive or a kink, it was a form of brutality, subjugation, genocide, and a prevention of insurgency. Then there's the survival aspect. If your friends, family, and children are dead, but you won't be sold off as a slave, it might be in your best survival interests to at least allow yourself to be raped in order not to anger the soldiers/warriors that might simply kill you out of annoyance, embarrassment, or rejection. If the Mongols, the Mayans, the Islamists, or the Japanese Fascists show up, you just gotta do what you gotta do.
The allure that women have is, as I said, power. Specifically a kind of power that can be used for protection. The Left has so poisoned men in their own ideological peer groups that the men that women want can't be found among the Left. The same can be said among the mainstream American middle-class culture to a similar degree.
This is why 50 Shades of Grey, both the pro-abuse film and the genuine rape erotica fan-fic was popular. Also why so much of women's porn to porn companies involves violence and getting fucking choked. Women do not actually want to be harmed, but there is no better expression of masculine power and protection than a man both valuing you and dominating you in bed. Giggity
There is an aspect of the notion of conquest. As in, the idea of being overwhelmed by dominance and power. However, actual conquest is a terrible violation at best, and not something to be desired.
Again, this is the difference between the middle-class romance fantasy of young woman running off into the wilderness and being carried off, and then married, by some strapping young tribal warrior; and the actual reality of a woman being carried off by a pack of tribal warriors who have just murdered her husband and eldest son, who were defending their farm, watched them scalp her remaining 3 children (including a daughter), and have her be raped by at least one of the warriors, then sold off to another tribe, where she would either be exchanged again or brought into the tribe as a member of lower rank.
You sound like you've never seen a woman betray her family and destroy her home for a cheap fling with a methhead who ended up beating the shit out of her and raping her.
/b/ is literally filled with sissies writing about this. I don't know why it surprises anyone. Women aren't self aware enough to be this open about it, but it works plenty on them too.
They all see themselves are noble, virtuous people with shameful kinky sides who long to be exploited by larger, more brutish evil men. Its why women fucked conquerors throughout history, its why BLACKED porn is literally a major category as is rapey everything in women's smut novels.
All this does is show whoever wrote this, likely a sissy loser of some sort, sees the world in incredibly simple stereotypes.
Somewhat Agree.
Sexual Selection for women will always favor those who are capable of protecting them, even if other aspects may be unattractive. The link between sex and violence is that women want to make sure men's violence can be used to protect them, and by extension their family.
I think you're going a little far about women being fucked by conquerors. It was not like women were looking to watch their homes get burned, their husbands/brothers/fathers get murdered, themselves get raped, and they and their children sold into slavery. That repeatedly happened in many conquests. It was not a positive or a kink, it was a form of brutality, subjugation, genocide, and a prevention of insurgency. Then there's the survival aspect. If your friends, family, and children are dead, but you won't be sold off as a slave, it might be in your best survival interests to at least allow yourself to be raped in order not to anger the soldiers/warriors that might simply kill you out of annoyance, embarrassment, or rejection. If the Mongols, the Mayans, the Islamists, or the Japanese Fascists show up, you just gotta do what you gotta do.
The allure that women have is, as I said, power. Specifically a kind of power that can be used for protection. The Left has so poisoned men in their own ideological peer groups that the men that women want can't be found among the Left. The same can be said among the mainstream American middle-class culture to a similar degree.
This is why 50 Shades of Grey, both the pro-abuse film and the genuine rape erotica fan-fic was popular. Also why so much of women's porn to porn companies involves violence and getting fucking choked. Women do not actually want to be harmed, but there is no better expression of masculine power and protection than a man both valuing you and dominating you in bed. Giggity
There is an aspect of the notion of conquest. As in, the idea of being overwhelmed by dominance and power. However, actual conquest is a terrible violation at best, and not something to be desired.
Again, this is the difference between the middle-class romance fantasy of young woman running off into the wilderness and being carried off, and then married, by some strapping young tribal warrior; and the actual reality of a woman being carried off by a pack of tribal warriors who have just murdered her husband and eldest son, who were defending their farm, watched them scalp her remaining 3 children (including a daughter), and have her be raped by at least one of the warriors, then sold off to another tribe, where she would either be exchanged again or brought into the tribe as a member of lower rank.
Those are different.
You sound like you've never seen a woman betray her family and destroy her home for a cheap fling with a methhead who ended up beating the shit out of her and raping her.
I'm speaking in general terms. Please don't take it personally.