To play devil's advocate, when you champion free speech, you have to defend even the most deplorable among you, lest your own rules be used against you. Now the Daily Mail having to pay damages is bullshit, everyone should be open to criticism, that's also part of free speech.
That would be relevant if the universities championed free speech for non-SJWs. But they don't, they do the opposite. Championing free speech means defending the speech of people you disagree with.
I'm all for her free speech, as despicable as it might be. However, she should be speaking her mind back in fucking India if she hates white people and the beautiful countries they built so much.
To play devil's advocate, when you champion free speech, you have to defend even the most deplorable among you, lest your own rules be used against you. Now the Daily Mail having to pay damages is bullshit, everyone should be open to criticism, that's also part of free speech.
Correct
That would be relevant if the universities championed free speech for non-SJWs. But they don't, they do the opposite. Championing free speech means defending the speech of people you disagree with.
No disagreement from me there. Academic institutions have been poisoned by leftism and authoritarianism for several decades now.
I'm all for her free speech, as despicable as it might be. However, she should be speaking her mind back in fucking India if she hates white people and the beautiful countries they built so much.