The repeal the 19th meme is funny but now I'm not sure that is as much of a problem.
The property requirement meant that only those with skin in the game were the ones who got to decide who governed. Without it we have paupers and indolents with the power to spend money that they did not earn or pay.
That inevitably leads to the death spiral from the famous quote:
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
Obviously no political movement can form based on this principle since our current "conservatives" are too spineless to even fight for voter ID requirements. But at least it is within the overton window allowing for public discussion.
No, we aren't. Wealthy celebrities are nothing more than pawns and financial investment vehicles. When I say inbreeding, I mean, no shit, cousin fucking to the point of genetic abnormalities in the aristocracy being fairly common. We really aren't at that level. All of the current oligarchy's 'incestuousness' is figurative, not literal. Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush did not have a kid in order to maintain the power of the uniparty system.
What we have now is similar to the global aristocracy of old because that's what happens when you get internationalist tyrants together.
Our situations are very different.
Here, take a look at how Capitalism replaced Feudalism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2gnxVhTci0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agPvpo3Qdsk
Well, I know that, and I also know that this is why the "eugenics" of "don't marry your cousin" is a thing. Yeah, that was probably THE biggest mistake, by people who had no concept of how heredity worked.
But the fact is, they're all IDEOLOGICALLY inbred, and are consolidating their power. We are HEADING towards a new kind of corporate fuedalism, where the illusion of voting for politicians is just that - an illusion, with everything being controlled by the Elon Musks and Jeff Bezos of the world, and the hollyweirdoes and media acting like the priest class.
Yes, I agree that they are pushing corporate feudalism. In fact, corporate feudalism is just regular feudalism. This is what Guilds are. The failure of "Western Feudalism" is that it is a totalitarian and authoritarian system which had to be abandoned due to the inevitable consequences of that system. A return to Feudalism is not an answer, and Feudalism (as it was) is till not workable.
But it seems to be the human animal's default position, unfortunately. All that old-school ethology crap about alphas and pecking orders? Came out of artificial groupings of individuals forced to deal with one another, and was actually projection on the part of the humans doing the pronouncements.
Why do you think they hate Whites so much? Getting whites together to do shit is like herding cats. The Alphas out there hate things that have minds of their own, and always have. The cycle repeats, even if it looks different every time it happens (more like a spiral than a "circle".)
Feudalism is not the same as higherachy, or social ordering. You're reducing social ordering and using it interchangably with very complex socio-economic & political system that existed primarily only in Europe and parts of MENA.
Okay, now you're mixing a whole bunch of stuff. European populations are highly organizable, they just aren't pan-organizable because they are very distinct from each other.
Alpha's are a specific kind of pack ordering that doesn't properly exist in humans. The vernacular term just refers to more dominant individuals, but you can't claim that those same individuals have an aversion to whites when plenty of them are also white.