This should be self-evident from the title, but I'm curious if the community would like to create an award listing and maybe some categories for games that we believe should be recognized and praised.
Considering that game journos are all Leftist pinko trash who should be helicoptered to the nearest volcano as the enemies of the people, and are at the very best: best a bunch of worthless bio-lenninst failures who's only goal in life is to be nothing more than corporate cock-sleeves using access-journalism to gatekeep themselves into positions of narcissistic self-importance within a giant incestuous harem of degeneracy and corporate cuckoldry, of which, even the light & majesty of God can not re-moralize. Given all that, we should probably just rely on our own experiences to disseminate the valuable human capital of what is, and is not, a shitty game.
Given that there is not much in the way of anti-Leftist gaming institutions, and given that any institution that is not explicitly anti-Leftist is destined to be subverted by Leftism, I was thinking that we could serve as an anti-Leftist platform that could give praise and attention to game developers as an anti-parallel institution to Leftists.
If you want, I can offer up some categories and an electoral process that I think would work and would prevent fraud, corruption, and brigading. I'll leave my ideas in the comments, but I'd like your input on if we should undergo such an award system.
If you think universal suffrage is bad, just wait to see in what kind of immense trouble we would be if only the supposedly intelligent - the sociology professors, the Ibram Kendi orbiters - were able to vote.
I would caution against making stuff too complicated. I can barely follow this as it is.,
But that's because you're stupid...
No, just kidding.
But seriously, I don't think we are going to form an intellectualist class when people are being nominated by a vast array of people.
Damn these tyrannical jannies, first robbing me of my right to vote, and now calling us, the common people, stupid.
REVOLUTION NOW!
The major trouble today is that every idiot elected to public office is a white-collar/lawyer/etc., which is why you get their preferences no matter who is in office. I'd like more coal miners and truckers as politicians.
Okay, but these are not public offices, and there is no bureaucracy for them to maintain.
I think I can explain it.
Trusted users pick three people they'd like to represent us. The top 12 are chosen.
They are then told to pick a winner for each category, with a 9-3 majority needed to agree it.
To me it seems this is not really the thing conducive to 'representation'.
Well, it's either that or it gets brigaded. I see the reasoning behind it.
My biggest issue is that if we're true to our beliefs, we can't have played many, if any, new games because of the various boycotts we're supposed to be doing.
No, there's always piracy. But I wouldn't want to play many of those games to begin with, even at the price of free...
Well, we already have a pseudo-vote system in the form of upvotes. Just do a nominations thread to filter out the top X games (or top per category) and then a regular vote/poll to pick the winners.