good luck with that one. And still, people change, feelings change. Marrying her is putting a loaded gun in her hand and letting her know she'll face no bad consequences if she unloaded it into your had. Sure, you might have found the unicorn, but that's a risk that less and less man are willing to take. Rightfully so.
get rid of no fault divorce
good luck with that one. And I really mean it. I wish you all the luck in the world because without it there's no getting rid of no fault divorce. Not unless women suffer from it. Which won't happen anytime soon.
Research prenup precedent
Yap, put more responsibility on the man. Good idea. He should have researched the fucking legal system before letting the state divorce rape him.
I mean, I think you mean well but as is, marriage is a game of russian roulette and only the man has to pull the trigger. You might survive but the odds are stuck mightily against you.
Unless the deal gets altered significantly you'll see the western family and civilisation with it crumble more and more. And I think it's insulting even thinking about blaming normal men for it.
The legal system and feminists have decided that. This doesn't mean that each individual woman has decided that. It is absolutely a risk to take seriously, but I've seen too much of the good that can come from relationships, in my parents', to give up on the whole deal.
Try changing it. End no fault divorce. End alymony. End welfare for single mothers. Implement default 50/50 custody.
I'm willing to bet that it will be way more than feminist women that will screech from the bottom of their souls. The legal system and feminists may have decided it but women were perfectly willing to go along with it and have used it to screw hundreds of millions of good men over with the power they wield without any remorse whatsoever.
I've seen too much of the good that can come from relationships, in my parents', to give up on the whole deal.
You do you. I'm rather sure nobody here cares about your decisions. The whole discussion started because you implied that pointing out stats and the overall shitty deal that marriage is for men is what is destroying marriage. But it isn't.
The shitty deal is what is destroying marriage. Men walk away from it because they have little to gain and everything to lose if shit hits the fan. Men walk away from women alltogether because society managed to make even being near a woman a liability for men. The Pence-rule is a thing for a reason and feminist screeching about a perfectly sensibly rule like this is not a coincidence.
The sad thing is: Men can't fix this. Not this time. And until women really start to suffer from the consequences of their irresponsible behaviour, nothing will change. But they won't suffer until it's to late because daddy government has taken the role of the provider and transfers money from men to women with force. And I for one believe that governments will completely break down before they even try to stop giving money to women.
good luck with that one. And still, people change, feelings change. Marrying her is putting a loaded gun in her hand and letting her know she'll face no bad consequences if she unloaded it into your had. Sure, you might have found the unicorn, but that's a risk that less and less man are willing to take. Rightfully so.
good luck with that one. And I really mean it. I wish you all the luck in the world because without it there's no getting rid of no fault divorce. Not unless women suffer from it. Which won't happen anytime soon.
Yap, put more responsibility on the man. Good idea. He should have researched the fucking legal system before letting the state divorce rape him.
I mean, I think you mean well but as is, marriage is a game of russian roulette and only the man has to pull the trigger. You might survive but the odds are stuck mightily against you.
Unless the deal gets altered significantly you'll see the western family and civilisation with it crumble more and more. And I think it's insulting even thinking about blaming normal men for it.
I ain't saying it's fair what men have to go through to protect ourselves. I'm saying it's necessary.
And I say it's not worth the hassle. Women have decided that they don't need to uphold their side of the contract. Men should do the same.
The legal system and feminists have decided that. This doesn't mean that each individual woman has decided that. It is absolutely a risk to take seriously, but I've seen too much of the good that can come from relationships, in my parents', to give up on the whole deal.
Try changing it. End no fault divorce. End alymony. End welfare for single mothers. Implement default 50/50 custody.
I'm willing to bet that it will be way more than feminist women that will screech from the bottom of their souls. The legal system and feminists may have decided it but women were perfectly willing to go along with it and have used it to screw hundreds of millions of good men over with the power they wield without any remorse whatsoever.
You do you. I'm rather sure nobody here cares about your decisions. The whole discussion started because you implied that pointing out stats and the overall shitty deal that marriage is for men is what is destroying marriage. But it isn't.
The shitty deal is what is destroying marriage. Men walk away from it because they have little to gain and everything to lose if shit hits the fan. Men walk away from women alltogether because society managed to make even being near a woman a liability for men. The Pence-rule is a thing for a reason and feminist screeching about a perfectly sensibly rule like this is not a coincidence.
The sad thing is: Men can't fix this. Not this time. And until women really start to suffer from the consequences of their irresponsible behaviour, nothing will change. But they won't suffer until it's to late because daddy government has taken the role of the provider and transfers money from men to women with force. And I for one believe that governments will completely break down before they even try to stop giving money to women.