It is undisputed that more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have signed the International EMF Scientists’ Appeal:
"Many recent scientific publications have shown that EMFs affect living organisms at levels far below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased risk of cancer, cellular stress, increased harmful free radicals, genetic damage, structural and functional changes in the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative effects on overall human well-being. The damage goes far beyond the human, as there is increasing evidence of harmful effects on both plant and animal life."
Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.
Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”
The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.
Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility).
Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.
“If the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavorable effects on industrial output and military functions.”
"The above statement and the entire report quite clearly reveal what the government knew and when it knew it. This also reveals WHY Western governments have subsequently been unwilling to acknowledge the bio-toxic effects of wireless systems or the legitimacy of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS), and why “safe limits” of exposure have been raised in subsequent years when, in fact, they need to be lowered."
Adverse Health Effects of 5G Mobile Networking Technology under Real-life Conditions
This article identifies adverse effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) reported in the premier biomedical literature. It emphasizes that most of the laboratory experiments conducted to date are not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of the real-life operating environment in which wireless radiation systems operate. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal. The vast majority do not account for synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli (such as chemical and biological) acting in concert with the wireless radiation. This article also presents evidence that the nascent 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, as commonly believed, but will have adverse systemic effects as well.
So due to Beamforming and MIMO, you get at the maximum usage 6V per meter. When you aren't using 5G, you're getting 0-3V. Your TV emits 10V. You're not talking about anti-personnel death rays here, these are cellphone antennas. Like I said, you can cook with microwaves, everyone knows that, but we're talking about electrons on the wind.
Do you have anything that says proteins are denatured with extremely low amounts of 60GHz radio?
I'm done reading your papers here, it looks like the lowest power microwave was about 388V/m constant exposure (microwaving mice) at ~2.3GHz. That paper from the 70s says nothing about 60 GHz, and any contemporary papers I've read so far are talking about 60 Hz (ELF) and not much about the intensity of the field. Other much lower frequencies that can penetrate and excite subdermally, and different frequencies resonate with different substances as you know. I'd like you to provide evidence of 60GHz microwaves (or any other 5G band) creating problems.
All the evidence so far has implied that living under powerlines or in any populated area gives you cancer.
Edit:
What do you think of the safety guidelines? Are they ignoring some biological mechanism? It seems to me that they took into account all the literature, and have come to the conclusions that raising core temperature by 0.1 degrees all day is fine, and that 60GHz will not penetrate the dermis, since skin is thicker than .49mm. You would definitely feel the heat locally on your skin before you get heat stroke, and airflow and sweat helps.
What do you think of the safety guidelines? Are they ignoring some biological mechanism?
Highly probable considering we are facing with a [trillion] dollar industry:
"Many recent scientific publications have shown that EMFs affect living organisms at levels far below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased risk of cancer, cellular stress, increased harmful free radicals, genetic damage, structural and functional changes in the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative effects on overall human well-being. The damage goes far beyond the human, as there is increasing evidence of harmful effects on both plant and animal life."
https://www.emfscientist.org
A quote from retired naval officer Jerry Flynn who was trained by the military in radio warfare:
"I spent the best part of those 27 years in radio communications but I was in signals intelligence electronic radio warfare so I know a lot about wireless radiocommunications, and your cell phone, your router your laptop, etc. All of those things are transmitters so they're no different in principle than the stuff that I work with in the military. Most of this stuff that you have today in our society was created by the military 50 years ago and most of the problems with microwave we knew 50 years ago is that that the military and private industry and governments have [suppressed it] so they could take financial advantage of it."https://youtu.be/DAD35Zeafzo
Here's a Lena Pu a researcher who shows blood slides from a healthy teacher after a full day of work around strong wi-fi and cellular signals in a classroom:
https://youtu.be/D1pzeTFmCn8?t=1881
Do you think all the 240 scientists that signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal was just for fun? Or is it because all of their research that they've conducted so far have come to the conclusion that this isn't something to take lightly and we shouldn't rush irresponsibly to install cells at every post in every block in every city in every state?
I don't know how you can't see this as problematic when research & the consensus of scientists in this particular field see it that way. Then you have a crazy nut like Musk who's aiming to launch 4,000 of these low-orbiting 5G satellites - they already have launched hundreds of them as they're attempting to launch 120 of them every month for this year. We are looking at the irradiation of every square centimetre of the Earth without taking in to account the impact it would have on the [Schumann Resonance].
And in case you missed it:
1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers on Electromagnetic Fields and Biology or Health:
https://www.emfscientist.org
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/
A quote from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) 1976 research document titled BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION RADIOWAVES AND MICROWAVES EURASIAN COMMUNIST COUNTRIES:
"The above statement and the entire report quite clearly reveal what the government knew and when it knew it. This also reveals WHY Western governments have subsequently been unwilling to acknowledge the bio-toxic effects of wireless systems or the legitimacy of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS), and why “safe limits” of exposure have been raised in subsequent years when, in fact, they need to be lowered."
https://archive.is/hC5qm
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842742030028X PDF: https://iervn.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/adverse-health-effects-of-5g-mobile-networking-technology-under-real-life-conditions.pdf
FYI: I was also talking about them weaponzing it which they can easily do.
So due to Beamforming and MIMO, you get at the maximum usage 6V per meter. When you aren't using 5G, you're getting 0-3V. Your TV emits 10V. You're not talking about anti-personnel death rays here, these are cellphone antennas. Like I said, you can cook with microwaves, everyone knows that, but we're talking about electrons on the wind.
Do you have anything that says proteins are denatured with extremely low amounts of 60GHz radio?
From the DIA document which summarized the effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure on the blood:
It also compromises your immune system.
I'm done reading your papers here, it looks like the lowest power microwave was about 388V/m constant exposure (microwaving mice) at ~2.3GHz. That paper from the 70s says nothing about 60 GHz, and any contemporary papers I've read so far are talking about 60 Hz (ELF) and not much about the intensity of the field. Other much lower frequencies that can penetrate and excite subdermally, and different frequencies resonate with different substances as you know. I'd like you to provide evidence of 60GHz microwaves (or any other 5G band) creating problems.
All the evidence so far has implied that living under powerlines or in any populated area gives you cancer.
Edit:
What do you think of the safety guidelines? Are they ignoring some biological mechanism? It seems to me that they took into account all the literature, and have come to the conclusions that raising core temperature by 0.1 degrees all day is fine, and that 60GHz will not penetrate the dermis, since skin is thicker than .49mm. You would definitely feel the heat locally on your skin before you get heat stroke, and airflow and sweat helps.
5G & Oxygen
https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet70/oet70a.pdf p12(p10) Figure 7
https://old.reddit.com/r/invisiblerainbow/comments/g975jg/blood_oxygen_heme_endocrine/
https://old.reddit.com/r/invisiblerainbow/comments/gwf8nh/atmospheric_manipulation_and_effects_on/
Highly probable considering we are facing with a [trillion] dollar industry:
A quote from retired naval officer Jerry Flynn who was trained by the military in radio warfare:
Here's a Lena Pu a researcher who shows blood slides from a healthy teacher after a full day of work around strong wi-fi and cellular signals in a classroom: https://youtu.be/D1pzeTFmCn8?t=1881
Do you think all the 240 scientists that signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal was just for fun? Or is it because all of their research that they've conducted so far have come to the conclusion that this isn't something to take lightly and we shouldn't rush irresponsibly to install cells at every post in every block in every city in every state?
I don't know how you can't see this as problematic when research & the consensus of scientists in this particular field see it that way. Then you have a crazy nut like Musk who's aiming to launch 4,000 of these low-orbiting 5G satellites - they already have launched hundreds of them as they're attempting to launch 120 of them every month for this year. We are looking at the irradiation of every square centimetre of the Earth without taking in to account the impact it would have on the [Schumann Resonance].
And in case you missed it:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842742030028X https://iervn.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/adverse-health-effects-of-5g-mobile-networking-technology-under-real-life-conditions.pdf