Why Trump will Win & What's Next Warning. - Kotaku In Action 2

Why Trump will Win & What's Next Warning. (youtu.be)

posted 4 years ago by neopowerave 4 years ago by neopowerave +15 / -2

11 comments

11 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (11)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– neopowerave [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

5G & Oxygen

https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet70/oet70a.pdf p12(p10) Figure 7

https://old.reddit.com/r/invisiblerainbow/comments/g975jg/blood_oxygen_heme_endocrine/

https://old.reddit.com/r/invisiblerainbow/comments/gwf8nh/atmospheric_manipulation_and_effects_on/

What do you think of the safety guidelines? Are they ignoring some biological mechanism?

Highly probable considering we are facing with a [trillion] dollar industry:

"Many recent scientific publications have shown that EMFs affect living organisms at levels far below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased risk of cancer, cellular stress, increased harmful free radicals, genetic damage, structural and functional changes in the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative effects on overall human well-being. The damage goes far beyond the human, as there is increasing evidence of harmful effects on both plant and animal life." https://www.emfscientist.org

A quote from retired naval officer Jerry Flynn who was trained by the military in radio warfare:

"I spent the best part of those 27 years in radio communications but I was in signals intelligence electronic radio warfare so I know a lot about wireless radiocommunications, and your cell phone, your router your laptop, etc. All of those things are transmitters so they're no different in principle than the stuff that I work with in the military. Most of this stuff that you have today in our society was created by the military 50 years ago and most of the problems with microwave we knew 50 years ago is that that the military and private industry and governments have [suppressed it] so they could take financial advantage of it." https://youtu.be/DAD35Zeafzo

Here's a Lena Pu a researcher who shows blood slides from a healthy teacher after a full day of work around strong wi-fi and cellular signals in a classroom: https://youtu.be/D1pzeTFmCn8?t=1881

Do you think all the 240 scientists that signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal was just for fun? Or is it because all of their research that they've conducted so far have come to the conclusion that this isn't something to take lightly and we shouldn't rush irresponsibly to install cells at every post in every block in every city in every state?

I don't know how you can't see this as problematic when research & the consensus of scientists in this particular field see it that way. Then you have a crazy nut like Musk who's aiming to launch 4,000 of these low-orbiting 5G satellites - they already have launched hundreds of them as they're attempting to launch 120 of them every month for this year. We are looking at the irradiation of every square centimetre of the Earth without taking in to account the impact it would have on the [Schumann Resonance].

And in case you missed it:

1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers on Electromagnetic Fields and Biology or Health:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842742030028X https://iervn.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/adverse-health-effects-of-5g-mobile-networking-technology-under-real-life-conditions.pdf

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– ionface 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Thank you for trying to explain your fears with evidence. I'm not seeing any good way to structure my thoughts on this, so I'll just reply to things as I see them.

60-GHz oxygen band: precise broadening and central frequencies of fine-structure lines, absolute absorption profile at atmospheric pressure, and revision of mixing coefficients

The information obtained in course of this work can be applied to Earth atmosphere remote sensing, microwave wireless communication, and industrial applications (see e.g.[27]), as well as for fundamental spectroscopic studies.

It's talking about the atmosphere, this was about modeling experiments better. It's using the same graph I posted earlier.

Effects of millimeter wave irradiation and equivalent thermal heating on the activity of individual neurons in the leech ganglion

the recognized U.S. safe exposure limit is 1 mW/cm2 for 6 min

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/unitconversion.asp ~61 V/m

That could heat your core body temperature 1°C if maintained for hours, which has no proven health effects, but is suspected dangerous (heat stroke is only a few degrees internal temperature diff), that's why our 5G standards are 6 V/m (0.1°C) at maximum usage. There are a lot of factors in this, but I'd recommend reading the icnirp paper for a solid overview.

This study then takes nerve clusters from leeches, and irradiates them with 894 V/m for 1 minute and sees how crispy they are.

A series of different mesh sizes, frequencies, geometric areas, and other parameter variations were used to confirm the absence of strong frequency-specific resonances or variations of MMW signal strength across the biological sample.

The purpose was to see how inhibited the nerves were when heated gradually in a bath versus with microwaves.

we observed an initial MMW-dose suppression of the firing rate (Fig. 5E), which might have been caused by an initially high thermal gradient. After 20–30 s of MMW exposure, as the heating gradient across the tissue becomes less pronounced, the exposure at higher IPD levels (2 and 4 mW/cm2) becomes less inhibitory.

They concluded that temporary pain relief might be some application.

What evidence is there in the reddit links? "So Corona in latin translates to crown/garland. You can again see the relevant symbolism to the medias CGI model of the virus." We know that they look like a sun under the microscope, that's why we named them that way.

Effects include increased risk of cancer, cellular stress, increased harmful free radicals, genetic damage, structural and functional changes in the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders

Where's the evidence? Bring more than "scientists agree".

Jerry Flynn's saying wifi causes autism, alzheimer's, parkinson's, and all sorts of other things. His comments on 5G (apocalypse). He makes a lot of mistakes when speaking, for example he claims 1 to 5GHz encompass the "2G, 3G, 4G, 5G" cell phone frequencies or calling every oscillating magnetic field "wifi". He's not a smart man, he's an alarmist with very little critical thinking skill, although I believe him when he says the industry isn't sympathetic to his cause. That's why I'm giving you the chance to explain, let's discover the truth of this matter.

Lena Pu hasn't published her blood study yet. I like that she's testing real-world exposure, but she seems pretty unscientific with her assertions.

240 scientists

research & the consensus of scientists in this particular field

a crazy nut like Musk

Haha, yeah.

1,670 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers

Right, go ahead and find the papers with evidence of non-thermal 5G injury.

permalink parent save report block reply