I doubt it. Larry Schweikart unironically says 'demoKKKrat', which just makes me take him not seriously.
The New York Times prediction based on actual results (which is what the Young Turks were citing as they were melting down) was quite accurate in 2016 and 2018 though.
Larry loves his quirky nicknames. His pinned tweet lists all of the nicknames he uses.
Larry has provided very accurate data in terms of early voting information.
It is quite foolish to discount all the data that he reports by his personality and his word usage.
This giving too much importance to the usage of certain words is a big part of why TDS exists. All the "Trump is saying bad words in his tweets or using improper words" fuckers do this shit.
Don't be like them.
You should be able to evaluate him based on the data he provides, not solely on some quirky nicknames that offend you.
You should know that this year, the corrupt mainstream news outlets(NYT, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC, Fox, ABC and CBS) will only call the states that Biden wins and they will purposely not call the states that Trump wins by saying they are waiting for all of the ballots.
If you want some timely updates, you won't be getting it from any mainstream media group. Maybe the small Trump supporting news outlets RSBN and OANN might be up to date.
You should be able to evaluate him based on the data he provides, not solely on some quirky nicknames that offend you.
It doesn't offend me, I think it's funny, but then I also think that he may not be a very serious person. Same reason I don't take seriously anyone who calls Republicans 'Rethuglicans' or 'Repuglicans'.
AP did some good calls in 2016 I recall. And while NYT may not call states, its prediction model was decent and was reliable - the stuff that Nate Cohn creates.
I doubt it. Larry Schweikart unironically says 'demoKKKrat', which just makes me take him not seriously.
The New York Times prediction based on actual results (which is what the Young Turks were citing as they were melting down) was quite accurate in 2016 and 2018 though.
Unfortunately, that can't be archived.
Larry loves his quirky nicknames. His pinned tweet lists all of the nicknames he uses.
Larry has provided very accurate data in terms of early voting information.
It is quite foolish to discount all the data that he reports by his personality and his word usage.
This giving too much importance to the usage of certain words is a big part of why TDS exists. All the "Trump is saying bad words in his tweets or using improper words" fuckers do this shit.
Don't be like them.
You should be able to evaluate him based on the data he provides, not solely on some quirky nicknames that offend you.
You should know that this year, the corrupt mainstream news outlets(NYT, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC, Fox, ABC and CBS) will only call the states that Biden wins and they will purposely not call the states that Trump wins by saying they are waiting for all of the ballots.
If you want some timely updates, you won't be getting it from any mainstream media group. Maybe the small Trump supporting news outlets RSBN and OANN might be up to date.
It doesn't offend me, I think it's funny, but then I also think that he may not be a very serious person. Same reason I don't take seriously anyone who calls Republicans 'Rethuglicans' or 'Repuglicans'.
AP did some good calls in 2016 I recall. And while NYT may not call states, its prediction model was decent and was reliable - the stuff that Nate Cohn creates.
Nate Cohn and Nate Silver are especially in Democrat dreamland this election cycle.
Their electoral map predictions in favor of a complete and utter landslide for Old Joe won't age well today.
Nate Pewter?
He's been hard at work walking it back over the past week. I think his most recent release last night was saying Trump has a 50/50 shot.
They know they're fucked they just can't admit it.