While regular liberals, at least classical liberals that most on this site most likely identified as years ago, have been ok with gays for a long time the democrat party has not been pro-LGBT. Lets not forget that Obama in his first term has run against gay marriage while Trump has been pro gay marriage before it was convenient to be.
There's a difference between wanting them to keep their moral degeneracy in the closet and putting them in prison. If anything, Republicans have been incredibly weak against the LGBT agenda which is why we are in the situation we are in now.
Republican is also the party of less regulation, individual freedom, free speech, equality of opportunity, religious freedom and all that. As a consequence the republican party did change to be a lot more accommodating to gays. So rather then conforming to all republican ideals he changed the party to something I personally can stand behind.
Trump LGBT friendly? Yeah bullshit... If he could, he'd put them all in prison
What are you basing that on?
He's Republican, they were always anti-LGBT.
Oh no! I have been bested, guess I should support the racist party if it means being pro-LGBT, hard choices.
Maybe you should stop assuming everyone will drop their own views to be with The Party(tm) like you do.
While regular liberals, at least classical liberals that most on this site most likely identified as years ago, have been ok with gays for a long time the democrat party has not been pro-LGBT. Lets not forget that Obama in his first term has run against gay marriage while Trump has been pro gay marriage before it was convenient to be.
There's a difference between wanting them to keep their moral degeneracy in the closet and putting them in prison. If anything, Republicans have been incredibly weak against the LGBT agenda which is why we are in the situation we are in now.
"Moral degeneracy" Fuck off with that homophobic attitude... You really proved that republicans are Anti-LGBT
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: "Republican" is a political affiliation.
That seems wrong. He was consistently pro-gays since the 90s. He was going to gay weddings and stuff and he is not religious. I simply do not see it.
Then why did he become a Republican, they were always anti-LGBT. If he's part of the party, he supports their ideology.
Republican is also the party of less regulation, individual freedom, free speech, equality of opportunity, religious freedom and all that. As a consequence the republican party did change to be a lot more accommodating to gays. So rather then conforming to all republican ideals he changed the party to something I personally can stand behind.
The ever drift leftward. In 20 years, the conservatives will be pro-pedophilia as well.
Individual freedom - freedom to be bankrupt because of medical costs.
Equality of opportunity - as long as you're a white male, if not the Republicans will remind you of your place
Religious freedom - unless you are atheist or a muslim, then they will treat you as a heathen
Free speech - as long as you have right wing opinions, if not you're a liberal/globalist/marxist/traitor of America etc
Comment Reported for: Rule 12: Falsehoods
Comment Approved: That's not how that rule works.