At this point, can we even claim that Journalism is anything but a sham? On the topic of taking the language back from the left, I think we just need a new term for a Journalist who actually does what they're supposed to do. A term which is completely divorced from the forever-tarred name of "Journalism"
The New York Times is to journalism what burning your mouth on hot cheese is to eating pizza.
The burn heals in a day. The NYT sticks around like cancer.
;^)
The worst part of it but it happens every time anyway?
Abrasive, greasy, and fills you with an overwhelming, if fleeting, combination of anger and determination.
At this point, can we even claim that Journalism is anything but a sham? On the topic of taking the language back from the left, I think we just need a new term for a Journalist who actually does what they're supposed to do. A term which is completely divorced from the forever-tarred name of "Journalism"