Adam was the perfect foil to Tim. Tim gets to continue fence sitting while Adam acts as a proxy for the audience, poking holes in Tim's neutrality as he become increasingly aware of the state of our nightmare world.
No he isn't. He is interested in facts that fit his world view. He has outright lied and misled people on various things that goes against his radical centrism. A good example of this is when he talks about leftists are more mentally ill, and he keeps trying to group the far-right he doesn't like in with the leftists in that, but the actual data shows the opposite.
The furthest right have less mentally ill people than the centrists, liberals, and libertarians.
I agree. Tim interrupts a lot. On the other hand, Ian is a dummy. Some of his brainlet-tier takes make my head hurt. I don't think he's a bad dude, but he really needs to take a second and think things through before just spitting them out. I do think Tim is better when he has guests to talk to, but some of them are even dumber than Ian.
I really wish we could recapture the vibe of the Sargon/Spencer/Styx/JFG debate. Damn that was fun. Spencer just trolled Sargon the whole time and threw out absurd arguments. Sargon was completely unprepared and basically had little to no foundation for his arguments, so he just kept telling everyone to read Locke. Styx and JFG were great. I don't remember what Warski was doing. Mostly just yelling out dumb reactions, I think.
And it is pretty bizarre to say that the only one who told the truth about Covington straight away, at great peril to his reputation, is "terrible at covering current events". If anything, I have been very impressed with his laser-like focus on the evidence whenever an accusation comes cross. Even when I considered that some news about Trump may be correct, Tim looked at the evidence, said it was nothing, and then turned out to be right. Less so with his prognostication, which is always that the GOP will win.
I like Tim. He's not perfect, but he at least seems to be genuinely interested in the truth and not partisan politics.
Adam was way better than the new guy.
Adam was the perfect foil to Tim. Tim gets to continue fence sitting while Adam acts as a proxy for the audience, poking holes in Tim's neutrality as he become increasingly aware of the state of our nightmare world.
Tim has good information, the same taste in topics as me, and is open about his bias. It's a fucking miracle.
No he isn't. He is interested in facts that fit his world view. He has outright lied and misled people on various things that goes against his radical centrism. A good example of this is when he talks about leftists are more mentally ill, and he keeps trying to group the far-right he doesn't like in with the leftists in that, but the actual data shows the opposite.
The furthest right have less mentally ill people than the centrists, liberals, and libertarians.
https://newspunch.com/survey-reveals-people-identify-left-wing-more-likely-diagnosed-mental-illness/
I prefer the IRL show to his standalone videos. Those are overly long and he goes off on tangents.
But he does have a tendency to talk over people
Bruh his IRL rambling is even longer than his "read the news for 10 minutes" segments.
I agree. Tim interrupts a lot. On the other hand, Ian is a dummy. Some of his brainlet-tier takes make my head hurt. I don't think he's a bad dude, but he really needs to take a second and think things through before just spitting them out. I do think Tim is better when he has guests to talk to, but some of them are even dumber than Ian.
I really wish we could recapture the vibe of the Sargon/Spencer/Styx/JFG debate. Damn that was fun. Spencer just trolled Sargon the whole time and threw out absurd arguments. Sargon was completely unprepared and basically had little to no foundation for his arguments, so he just kept telling everyone to read Locke. Styx and JFG were great. I don't remember what Warski was doing. Mostly just yelling out dumb reactions, I think.
Username checks out.
And it is pretty bizarre to say that the only one who told the truth about Covington straight away, at great peril to his reputation, is "terrible at covering current events". If anything, I have been very impressed with his laser-like focus on the evidence whenever an accusation comes cross. Even when I considered that some news about Trump may be correct, Tim looked at the evidence, said it was nothing, and then turned out to be right. Less so with his prognostication, which is always that the GOP will win.