4
YesMovement 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, he's exactly claiming he didn't make remarks about the Emergencies Act specifically, just the people it was invoked upon.

But the judicial issue isn't whether the EA is constitutional, but if invoking it ON THE FREEDOM CONVOY is. The whole point is if the FC was big & bad enough to need the EA.

As mentioned in the article, we just had a judge who initially said he wasn't going to recluse himself from another trial but did after he heard submissions:

He told parties at the time there was “no legal basis for his recusal” but was doing to “avoid his participation becoming a distraction.”

And that was just because he was board president for one of the plaintiffs https://archive.is/wip/ahJ4G

From 2006 to 2019, Jamal was on the board of directors of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), which along with the National Council of Canadian Muslims filed a legal challenge on June 17, 2019 in Quebec Superior Court to stay the application of the secularism law and declare it invalid.

7
YesMovement 7 points ago +7 / -0

I am writing to advise that Chief Justice Wagner has considered the certificates and letter, and has concluded that there is no actual or reasonable apprehension of bias that would require his recusal under the applicable legal test. In this respect, Chief Justice Wagner has advised that he did not, at any time, either directly or indirectly, comment on the Emergencies Act, RSC 1985, c 22 (4th Supp) or matters at issue in the proceedings

Then in a press conference in June 2022, the chief justice described the impact of the Freedom Convoy’s blockades on many Ottawa business and individuals — particularly “the most vulnerable” — as “deplorable.”

He also implemented a mask mandate at the SCOC, a complete Branch Covidian.

https://x.com/LitigationGuy/status/2050201317944037537

There is considerable hand wringing in Canadian establishment circles about the loss of faith in institutions. This is usually attributed to some vague mythical populist campaign against these institutions. The truth is that the institutions are doing it to themselves.

3
YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

They do have good, fair priced coffee though (talking the reg McCafe not the fancy dan stuff)

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

Were cockroaches and bedbugs made in God's image?

Stop trying to justify your racism with some species saving morality claim.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

Burden of proof means the person making the positive statement has the burden. I'm saying we don't do something (kill off children), you're making the claim we should do it so the burden is fully on you.

I take it you're not a Christian then? Because they're all the children of God, created in His image so we all have inherent dignity. These children didn't rape or murder etc that would cause them to forfeit their lives by their own actions.

I believe being a human being gives you inherent value.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was parroting your irrational response...

Where in the Bible does suggest killing the weak? Because the 6th commandment seems to disagree with you and not just there:

John 10:11 "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep."

The Parable of the Lost Sheep- Jesus describes a shepherd leaving 99 sheep to find 1 lost one, carrying it home rejoicing

Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart"

Psalm 139:13-14 "For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb"

Matthew 25:40 "Whatever you did for one of the least of these… you did for me."

Matthew 9:13 "I desire mercy, not sacrifice."

Nothing in Christianity supports your claim, if fact your idea violates because you declare yourself smarter than God and are fixing His "mistakes"

5
YesMovement 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're the one who started with a childish "nuh-uh" rebuttal, would you like to try and actually make a big boy argument against "All children are precious and deserve to live"?

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they're not the product of illegals where are they supposed to live?

3
YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

I support not killing defenseless children, a billion people including adults are starving- do you support endless murder in poor countries to keep populations low? Of course not.

20
YesMovement 20 points ago +20 / -0

Bunny doesn't speak a language the overwhelming majority of America understands. Even if you think rap belongs, Kanye certainly is a better writer than Young Thug or Missy Elliott. Eminem is a woke liberal and one of the greatest rappers even but I guess even that can't overcome being a straight white male.

3
YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was thinking white woman in glasses, other most likely guesses would be black woman or Jeet male.

10
YesMovement 10 points ago +10 / -0

So this is sitting at +10 votes and not 0 because of that downvote error, right?

Comments don't seem to show many agreeing with him. All 10 of you have the balls to put your name down here as an upvote?

5
YesMovement 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, a slight gust of wind and even the world's best sharpshooter would accidentally kill him. And wind isn't even the biggest or more likely variable.

6
YesMovement 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't think it collapses if they leave, it takes 10 Canadians to pay for one Singh Horton's worker. We've got big unemployment especially youth.

Economy only goes up if we sent the jeets back.

10
YesMovement 10 points ago +10 / -0

https://x.com/YukonStrong/status/2047378139920441463

Danielle Smith reveals the singular most hidden statistic on the the StatsCan Website: TFW workers cost the economy 10x more than they produce. This is why Canada's GDP is in freefall.

36
YesMovement 36 points ago +36 / -0

She had worked for the U.S. Agency for International Development or related groups for more than two decades. She made $175,000 a year. That was Jan. 28, 2025. Today Amy Uccello and her husband, who also lost his job when U.S.A.I.D. funding for his nonprofit dried up, rely on food stamps

NYT writes this as an ORANGE MAN BAD but of course it actually reveals these were talentless people being extremely overpaid.

You were making 6 figures for 2 decades and not only didn't save enough but are so talentless you can't get any job?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›