-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +2 / -3

I just refuse to censor myself.

I came from a country that's about to make it illegal to criticize women, after decriminalizing women killing us. Where the main police force suggests 10% of men need to be in prison. Where the media is run by, regulated by and written by women, with aggressive dehumanization a constant theme.

Would you tell a Cuban that communists aren't that bad?

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +4 / -9

I'm willing to have it anywhere, honestly.

Rule 16 is bullshit. The reason stormcucks breach it is because it's a tiny minority of Jews who hold power and abuse it. Women can't be a protected identity group because scientific study has shown the majority have an active distaste for men.

How can it be an unfair characterization when it's more likely to be true than false?

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

"Biden sycophant backs Biden appointee"

Really? You're shocked?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

Do they though?

They are under the same banner, but I don't believe for two seconds that the institution the sisterhood took over would take any orders they don't agree with.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +7 / -8

No, I want to have this debate.

The whole "poisoned women" line flies in the face of reality.

They haven't changed. They've just been more open about how they feel as a result of not needing us to provide.

We lost chains we didn't even know we had, but now we have to recognize the slavemasters who put us in them.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +4 / -8

I presume this is in light of the extremely female leadership of the Secret Service.

4
TheImpossible1 4 points ago +7 / -3

I saw.

This place really has some...interesting members now.

I'll mod if it means I can't get banned 😂

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +6 / -10

I just phrased it badly. It's a 39% upper bound, with a theoretical >1% lower bound.

And yes, studies have repeatedly confirmed women's extreme in-group preference. I'd be really curious how it compares to a Klan member's anti-black preference and other known hate groups against their targets.

I think women would look even worse.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +5 / -7

Muhammad, is that you? You've returned? The Pallies need you!

5
TheImpossible1 5 points ago +11 / -6

This is so obviously a Fed post.

I do find it interesting in a psychological sense how anger in a cheating situation is directed towards the man who has no obligation to you, and not the woman who did.

But I'm not endorsing murder. As I said already, they want more of their own to be murdered, because it enables escalation of their rhetoric.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +4 / -8

Ridiculous claim.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +6 / -12

I don't agree. I think by now, with the massive oversaturation of feminist propaganda, everyone is well aware what they're endorsing.

Hell, the deeper message of Barbie was that women should keep men as slaves and make sure they never revolt, and it's one of the highest grossing movies of all time. They know damn well what they're endorsing and it shows in what they vote for.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +6 / -8

Because, my dear Fed, killing them will give them the excuses they need to escalate to their true goal.

Even if you don't morally care about murder, it's not a valid political strategy, because you're playing directly into their hands.

Feminists would love a Reichstag Fire type event that would enable them to seize control of society.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +8 / -9

Both of those ideas are insane.

Net taxpayer makes the most sense, provided all the female quota hires start being fired for their illegitimate way of being hired.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +5 / -11
3
TheImpossible1 3 points ago +10 / -7

property has portfolio value, women just drain yours.

Had to make that joke.


I'm not going to go this far, I'm just sticking to the facts. It's worse odds than a coin flip, and people gamble their lives, their futures on it.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +4 / -9

SK was betrayed. They elected a leader who said he'd finally deal with the remnants of Megalia and he did nothing.

Instead, the government pours billions they don't have into doomed attempts to raise the birth rate during a gender war.

No unity after what they supported. Most men in SK wouldn't even think about it.

And don't get me started on the government dating app in Japan. "not compulsory" for now, but that won't last when they realize free men want to stay free.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +10 / -11

Terrible idea. Every candidate would be controlled by the woman in their life like Woodrow Wilson was.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +4 / -4

I got beaten to it, took too long to get the archive.

Archive Link

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Archive Link


An openly anti-woman VP on the Trump ticket? Pinch me...

Trump/Vance 2024 - Stop Women's Hate Again!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›