-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +8 / -15

Thanks. I was being cordial, that was uncalled for.

I don't think my "insanity" will die with me. I think at this point most men aren't considering having kids.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

Even you should admit that recent events have greatly strengthened my position.

Women's groups are openly talking about using capital as leverage to fire more men. The trans shooter wasn't trans. Women slipped a rape bill through while everyone was tilting at rainbow flags.

I heard from someone that women's groups are building capital to buy up property to rent out below market to women only.

Have to look into that one. Could be big. Rent restrictions were what blew apart the race debate if I remember correctly.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Black people have been told since day one that the right is racist, wants them all gone etc. Honestly, some corners of this website verify it, but they just represent glowfucks and "journalists" planting bait, hopefully.

I just have anecdotal evidence. I know a few men around my age who are actively listening to political debate and they are so sick of hearing about women's non-issues that they just want women's sports shut down entirely. (Good idea, honestly. I support it.)

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +1 / -5

He's just arguing semantics. Feds would be MI5/MI6 in this case. It just means glowfucks.

It was proven that government intelligence agencies were tasked with crushing anti-lockdown sentiment by Johnson.

What else have they been told to silence?

How far are they willing to go to silence it?

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +4 / -7

Better tell the Church of Scientology, they'd love to be able to claim they aren't a cult.

Women trap men so that the father is forced to pay child support. It's much less work for them than actually working.

It's just a fact. If they really cared about reducing pollution, they'd want to reduce population growth. The fact they aren't anti-woman proves they are not sincere.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

Well, I wasn't going to keep the original pro-woman title and have my name attached to it.

I don't believe gay people existing is a problem. I don't even think trans people existing is a problem. I think if you prevent a feminized culture, nobody will want to change gender except those who are genuinely unwell in the head.

To be fair, my opposition's tactics is to log on, downvote everything I say regardless of community or topic, then log back off.

4
TheImpossible1 4 points ago +13 / -9

Absolutely unhinged, and this is coming from someone who thinks parenthood is one of the biggest mistakes a man can make.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

I don't think it's editorialized at all. Everything I said was true. The law was written and advocated by feminists, it does remove the need for evidence and everyone was distracted by "the gays" while it was being quietly passed.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +4 / -5

Are you really lecturing me on feminism?

No, I don't. I think that we should be more careful who we believe and of the stereotypical innocence/benevolence assigned to young women.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +4 / -14

Greta Thunberg supporter

No, and those people don't put their money where their mouth is anyway. Look at Elon crying about single childless men while being a climate cultist who has his entire business based on that ideology.

None of those people have the balls to follow through with their ideology and condemn women who trap men to produce unwanted kids.

No, no, you give up your car and heating, so Karen, Alejandra and...what's a stereotype black woman name? can shit out kids from random fathers who never wanted to be parents for the 18 year pay off so they don't have to work.

If you really, truly believe the world will end if we don't change things, you shouldn't be protesting Chevron and ExxonMobil. You should be protesting outside family courts to remove the incentive for women to have unwanted kids.

The fact that they don't do that shows that they are just a feminist-controlled movement attacking industries that hire mostly men.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +9 / -16

She repeatedly threatened to keep their daughter from him, court documents revealed, according to the outlet. She told him over WhatsApp that she was moving in with a new man, who she said would be their child's new father. She also informed Metzger that he would never see his child again.

"I hope for [the child's] sake that you do kill yourself," Reusch allegedly texted him. "She would be better off not even knowing you."

She also told him that she would have sex with her new man on Mother’s Day "while your daughter calls him daddy." At another point, Reusch allegedly sent a video of her having sex with another man after Metzger sent her $200, which she said was not enough.

Tradcucks : "You just didn't choose the right woman"

Tradcucks if they had to teach kids about safety : "It hurts because you touched the wrong stove! You have to get to know the stove and learn which stove to trust! Don't stop touching stoves, that would be stupid!"

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +4 / -6

Yeah, no. There are countries with "yes means yes" rape law where the woman doesn't even have to prove you have even met.

The only thing that protects justice is keeping women's meddling out of the system.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +2 / -6

Yawn.

Trump leads women's sports advocate DeSimp by 51 points. But as for evidence of that, I'm struggling to find any breakdown of 2020 voting vs 2022 voting. I guess I'll have to wait for 2024.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +7 / -8

You're too optimistic.

All she has to say is "he was bigger than me, I felt nervous, he might have hurt me so I didn't say anything, I just did what he asked." and some poor guy is fucked.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›