-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +1 / -10

I mean, what's the point of actual discussion on an obvious shitpost?

I just find it funny that people unironically believe that reparations are owed to Christians, when tradcucks and women are 100% the people who should be paying others reparations.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

You know people are sick of you enough to want to find you and kill you, right?

Is that a threat?

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

I agree, the official line that the men who are visible in power are making the decisions is absolutely ridiculous. How stupid can people be to think that all these financial decisions of the state that disproportionately benefit women just happen by coincidence.

Only a fucking moron would believe that they just happen to get what they want, because the people in power "like" them.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

It's literally exactly what Carrie Symonds was caught doing as Boris Johnson's handler.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +6 / -16

Shhhhhhh, we have to let the retards yell until they get tired and fall asleep.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +2 / -6

Leftists do Wom*n to show their hatred of men, mine was more a joke about how they're so evil they shouldn't be named at all.

Get rid of Rule 16 and let me call them what they truly are.

-15
TheImpossible1 -15 points ago +1 / -16

Marriage is your failure, own it.

Own the millions of destroyed lives worldwide, the thousands raising kids that aren't theirs, the hundreds of thousands of men being milked dry for every cent of wealth by the system your shitty ideology created.

And do not give me the "that was the government" excuse - you continued shilling marriage while these systems were ruining lives. It becomes your responsibility.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +1 / -10

But nothing is more laughable than saying "muh joos" are.

At least my prediction is based on events that transpired in other countries, and saying Joe is in charge is based on normie understanding.

Saying "muh joos" is just a pathetic joke to avoid confronting what's going on.

2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +10 / -8

Condemning women's sexism is impossible. It's so intrinsic in their brains that you'd have to condemn their entire existence. There have been so many studies attempting to disprove it and they all confirm it.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Probably the latter.

She needs to keep him in power because it is the veneer of legitimacy over the top of the shadow cabinet she's running. Carrie Symonds 2.0.

I don't know if it'll ever come out, but I'd put money on Jill having her own team that acts in Joe's name and the visible cabinet is purely people getting kickbacks for being quiet about it.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +1 / -7

No, she's his handler who covers up his mental health issues.

Zelensky's the one married to a professional scriptwriter.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +1 / -7

Remember Carrie Symonds?

Not the first time they've pulled this trick and it won't be the last.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

completely unrelated people

The first reply other than myself was a stormfaggot handshake.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

Nearly a dozen aides and advisers in Biden world described the first lady as someone who has grown more willing to endure the rigors and demands of being in the political spotlight herself — and more convinced of her husband’s fit for the job. Close advisers say she feels a comfort level with her role inside the White House, balancing the ceremonial responsibilities of the office with the weight of serving as a trusted adviser to the president. “She is always his final gut check” is how the former senior adviser put it.

“She can reach suburban women, in particular, in a way that really resonates with them. She is really effective in talking about how the Biden agenda is good for moms, for women, for working women,"

Multiple aides recall that in meetings they both attend, the president will frequently look over to his wife, who is often wearing her glasses and taking notes, and ask, “Hey Jill, what do you think?”

Some aides have described her as “the closer” — the confidant the president trusts to give him unfiltered advice before he reaches a decision.

#MoreFeminineWay is real, send your apologies in private messages, downvoters and stormfaggots.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +6 / -7

Research has yet to explore whether gender bias against men produces gender gaps favoring women in health care, early education, and domestic (HEED) engagement. Supporting preregistered predictions, results from an online study with MTurkers (N = 296) and a laboratory study with college students (N = 275) revealed that men expressed less sense of belonging, positivity toward, and aspirations to participate in HEED (and anticipated more discrimination) than did women when exposed to the reality of antimale gender biases in these domains.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

JPM tried to save it by pumping money in.

I think they have a valid claim to own it given their efforts.

-17
TheImpossible1 -17 points ago +1 / -18

No, that's when someone makes a post criticizing your beloved white women.


I'm not sure why my complaint isn't valid. If you want to claim land for Christianity as reparations, it's valid to claim land back from you for the lives your ideology destroyed.

-35
TheImpossible1 -35 points ago +2 / -37

That's fine, but men are entitled to reparations for all the lives ruined by marriage.

So...that's our land, and you'll still owe us more.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +6 / -6

It's just a pun of First Republic's slogan. They didn't actually say that.

It's a Privilege to Serve You.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

Of course it isn't. Regulating women's desire to exploit others is as ridiculous as trying to regulate dogs into eating vegan.

You need to stop women from producing people vulnerable to their exploitation in the schools.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›