"In another comment thread...."
So I'm supposed to sift through multiple hundreds of posts to find one more of your moronic posts in which you're wrong (verifiably so) for the umpteenth time. No thanks. Rather than being a passive-aggressive child, why don't you copy/paste the argument to this post so I can destroy, once again, whatever nonsense you used to rationalize why you're wrong about everything.
No, there is no "thing." The fact that you keep trying to rationalize your obviously false position means you're either trolling or mentally retarded in some way.
"...You are not qualified to just assert what it means without extensive explanation or sources."
I'm not as ASE-certified mechanic but I know what a flat tire looks like. There's no vagueness in any of the terms. They're very specific and detailed. What's more, is that Jeremy Boreing himself said on his response video that all of Crowder's content, social media accounts, merchandise, go back to Crowder AFTER THE CONTRACT PERIOD!!!! Got it? Do you need a more definitive SOURCE than the CEO of the Daily Wire literally saying out loud that everything ever produced by Crowder, even stuff Crowder produces himself DURING the contract period, belongs to Crowder AFTER the contract period. If Daily Wire produces it, they keep it. Are you not bright enough to understand that Not Gay Jared Owen Benjamin and Sven Computer didn't get to keep any of the content they were involved in after they left LWC or are you just trolling?
There's no vagueness and nothing deceptive. Any up-and-coming talent that isn't smart enough to hire a contract lawyer to pore over a contract, deserves to be taken for everything he has. Enough with the goddamn participation trophies and holding everyone's hand. If you're so dumb that you sign a contract that you don't understand, you deserve to be fleeced.
"Go one section down."
I did. It said the exact same fucking thing about it being DURING THE TERM! I feel like I'm picking on a retarded kid. Dumbass, they don't own any of his content AFTER the contract is over. Got it? The "perpetual and exclusive rights" are to whatever DAILY WIRE produces DURING the contract period! If Crowder produces it, HE OWNS THE CONTENT, including whatever he made BEFORE the contract!
You people will create straw man after straw man to rationalize this brain-dead take. It's just baffling that there could be anyone this stupid.
And yes, Crowder calling millions of dollars "slave wages" just like Kaepernick did, is EXACTLY THE SAME! Have an adult explain it to you. This sub used to have some intelligent people on it years ago when it was on Reddit, but now it's just filled with many of the same moronic millennials whose sole existence is predicated on "upvotes" and Reddit coins.
If that was in fact your comment, then that was even dumber than I thought it was. Again, get this simple concept through your head, signing a Term Sheet doesn't necessarily mean you agree with the terms. It's a Letter of Intent, just like what college basketball players sign when they plan on signing with a specific school. But it's NON-BINDING and you can back out at any time or negotiate for a different contract.
You must've seen it on CNN or MSNBC as there's no way you could possibly be on the right, as everything you argue about sounds exactly like a Liberal, especially thinking that not being on this platform every single day and getting downvoted is some kind of insult. It's literally the opposite. Spending every waking moment on this or any other social media platform and farming for upvotes is what is pathetic.
Crowder mentioned a company that did AD READS. Fox, NewsMax and OAN don't do AD READS so you're obviously lying or at the very least, have never watched any of those networks. And of course everyone knew it was either BlazeTV or Daily Wire and since Crowder specifically said it wasn't BlazeTV....well, do the math...or have someone help you with the math.
Do you literally just come back the same day with the same moronic take that a 10 year-old could see is wrong? A NON-BINDING term sheet is not the same as a BINDING contract. Signing a Term Sheet is not an admission that the contract "looks fine." That's a laughable assertion. Have an adult explain it to you.
I've been watching and enjoying Crowder for more than 13 years but you people are in love with him to an unhealthy degree. It's a cult at this point.
There's this moron on KotakuInAction2 who gave the most moronic analogy about putting "I can fuck your wife" in a contract. This person made that moronic analogy because he couldn't make his point work without saying something that stupid. He also said something even dumber, claiming that signing a NON-BINDING term sheet, would somehow be legally binding, even though it's literally NON-BINDING.
I didn't mention this imbecile's name though so there's no way anyone could possibly figure out who I'm talking about.
"Crowder also brought it up in the phone call..."
You mean the phone call that he knew he was recording and that he knew he'd play for the public? Are you telling me you're so gullible that you'd believe anything he said on that call that he knew he'd play for the public? What up-and-coming talent? That's the biggest virtue-signal I've probably ever heard and that includes virtue-signaling Liberals. Crowder doesn't give a rat's ass about up-and-coming talent.
And your YouTube link shows Crowder explaining that DW retains Crowder's content DURING the contract period. Christ Almighty, how can you people keep repeating the same nonsensical falsehood that they retain all his content in perpetuity AFTER the contract period? Look at 'b", under "Additional Rights", when Crowder shows it on the screen (the exact time stamp that you linked). It says "DURING THE TERM."
And the Kaepernick argument wasn't superficial. It was about as damning as you could possibly get. Simply dismissing it as superficial is a classic Liberal tactic. But seeing as so many Crowder fanboys are actually closet Socialists, that now favor workers over the people that build companies, it's apropos.
Predatory OFFER. There's an oxymoron if there ever was one. This is that same gaslighting horseshit that Black people complained about when they defaulted on loans from banks and lost their houses.
If banks don't loan to Black people because they're more likely to default, it's Redlining. If they make loans to Black people and they default, Predatory Lending.
I guess you forgot about the skit Crowder did on Colin Kaepernick calling himself a wage slave at the hands of slave master NFL. It's still up on Crowder Bits, it's called "Colin Kaepernick Re-Re-Boot of Roots."
Which is just retarded as Crowder himself demands his people censor themselves enough to remain on YouTube. Gerald Jr. said exactly that on Tim Pool's show.
DW approached them formally, with an offer, but they both admitted they talked many times before that in general terms.
He absolutely can't get that deal anywhere or BlazeTV would've never let him go. BlazeTV had the receipts on MugClub subscribers, so the fact that they didn't do everything to keep him there should tell you a lot.
Yeah, because you just arbitrarily pay your friends more money if they come work for you. What friends don't do however, is try to destroy their friend's company because they couldn't come to a contractual understanding. Not offering Crowder what Crowder thought he should be paid isn't trying to sabotage Crowder.
Demonetized but still on the platform. Sounds like some Gangsta Rapper that keeps getting arrested to sell more albums in his fight against "the man" but never gets sent to prison.
Steven Crowder is a rebel, a crusader and a big fighter against Big Tech. Yet he's never been permanently banned off of any Big Tech platform in the world. Not YouTube, Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. He's starting to look like the Ray Epps of Conservative voices.
Tthe contract was out-of-touch and excessive with the brand and likeness in perpituity."
How is it that people keep parroting this trope? There was NOTHING that said DW retains the brand and likeness in perpetuity. Boreing very clearly said that they owned all his content DURING the contract period, but after the contract ended, everything that Crowder owned BEFORE the contract and everything Crowder produced himself during the contract, would go back to Crowder. The ONLY thing kept in perpetuity was anything that DW produced during the contract period. That's it.
I know, $12.5 million/yr is the literal equivalent of slavery multiplied by 5 Holocausts. Tucker Carlson makes $6 million/yr but still, it's literal slavery to offer someone $12 million/yr.
The greatest irony is that Crowder actually had a skit a few years ago with Quarter Black and Dave Landau satirizing Colin Kaepernick regarding his retarded claim that he was a slave and the NFL were slaveholders.
A lot of the Crowder people keep making bad-faith arguments. Whatever argument you could make about what a friend should "offer" to a friend, you can just turn around and make the same argument as to what a friend should "take" from a friend. That point cancels the "friend" argument out in terms of BUSINESS. But what friends don't do is try to sabotage their friend's business because they don't like the business terms.
If I own a lawn-mowing business and a friend wants to hire me to cut the lawn/trim the bushes at his business and he offers to pay me less than the job is worth, I tell him that's not enough, here's what it would have to be and if he says that's too much, we both move on. We're still friends. What I don't do is go out and try to fuck his entire company over because we couldn't come to terms on a business deal.
Crowder is the snake in this whole debacle.
And the whole point of having a content creator employed at your publishing company, is for him to generate revenue to make your multimillion dollar investment in him worth the investment.
Why do people keep believing that Crowder is so edgy and bucks the "system?" He's STILL on YouTube and Twitter, while hundreds of other content creators were permanently banned years ago. What has he ever said that someone on the Daily Wire hasn't also said? What topic is he so edgy about?
Crowder's just like a Televangelist that says it's not about the money, it's about spreading the gospel, as he simultaneously passes the collection plate around.
You don't add the percentages. They all come from different sources of revenue.
Holy shit that's a moronic take. If they run bot campaigns to get his accounts struck, then they can't monetize the videos and get any revenue from them. I've seen other people post similar sentiments and it's mind-boggingly stupid. The purpose of any business is to make money and you're saying they're going to sabotage their own revenue just so they can penalize him for not generating any revenue.
I just got a 3-day ban in the Kotakuinaction2 Reddit sub for commenting on Seth Rogen's Tweet about the US needing diversity. My comment was "he wants diversity but not for Jews in Israel."
For the last 4 years, I was bookmarking and screenshotting articles and posts to show to Liberal friends and family as evidence of hypocrisy and violence from the Left. It took me 4 years to realize that it was pointless, because even if a being dropped down from the sky and stopped time and made a declaration contradicting Leftist groupthink, they'd summarily dismiss it since it wasn't on MSNBC.
If I "skipped over it" it's because it was really stupid and pointless to respond. I asked you to copy/paste it in your response here but it's obvious you just want to cry about it rather than have it be addressed.