Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

49
Steven Crowder responds to Daily Wire: It was never about the money (www.youtube.com)
posted 2 years ago by YesMovement 2 years ago by YesMovement +50 / -1
113 comments share
113 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (113)
sorted by:
▲ 0 ▼
– Hypnotoad24 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

A lot of the Crowder people keep making bad-faith arguments. Whatever argument you could make about what a friend should "offer" to a friend, you can just turn around and make the same argument as to what a friend should "take" from a friend. That point cancels the "friend" argument out in terms of BUSINESS. But what friends don't do is try to sabotage their friend's business because they don't like the business terms.

If I own a lawn-mowing business and a friend wants to hire me to cut the lawn/trim the bushes at his business and he offers to pay me less than the job is worth, I tell him that's not enough, here's what it would have to be and if he says that's too much, we both move on. We're still friends. What I don't do is go out and try to fuck his entire company over because we couldn't come to terms on a business deal.

Crowder is the snake in this whole debacle.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Brennus 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Except he didn’t go out and try to fuck over an entire company over. He never said Daily Wire. He actively avoided naming them. Daily wire thought it was a good idea and claim the shitty term sheet. A term sheet they admit they didn’t think he would agree to and would spend months negotiating. Why offer something full of terms you know the other side would not agree to? And guess what, if crowder was dumb and signed that term sheet it would have become the contract. So why offer terms you know someone you claim is a friend would be screwed over if they signed?

What if in your hypothetical lawn care business your friend also requests while you are cutting his grass he gets to fuck your wife? You would obviously be insulted. And his response is “well I didn’t think you’d go for it but it’s the standard offer I give all my lawn care providers”. Clearly that’s not really a friend and they were trying to take advantage of you. You then tell people at the bar that they would never guess what crap deal this anonymous person offered for you to cut their grass. Then the dumbass “friend” says it was me from the other side of the room.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Hypnotoad24 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

There's this moron on KotakuInAction2 who gave the most moronic analogy about putting "I can fuck your wife" in a contract. This person made that moronic analogy because he couldn't make his point work without saying something that stupid. He also said something even dumber, claiming that signing a NON-BINDING term sheet, would somehow be legally binding, even though it's literally NON-BINDING.

I didn't mention this imbecile's name though so there's no way anyone could possibly figure out who I'm talking about.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Brennus 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Do you literally just come back every 2 weeks to make bad takes? That’s significantly more detailed than what crowder did and more detailed than my example. And yes, if he said that term sheet looked fine it would have been the contract. Have fun watching controlled opposition that funds obvious grifters like Candace Owens

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Hypnotoad24 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Do you literally just come back the same day with the same moronic take that a 10 year-old could see is wrong? A NON-BINDING term sheet is not the same as a BINDING contract. Signing a Term Sheet is not an admission that the contract "looks fine." That's a laughable assertion. Have an adult explain it to you.

I've been watching and enjoying Crowder for more than 13 years but you people are in love with him to an unhealthy degree. It's a cult at this point.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 2p765 (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy