Or the Doctor's Plot, or the campaign against 'rootless cosmopolitans'.
You are a Stalinist.
Is taking $10 from the undeserved wealth of a scurrilous multi-billionaire so that a deserving poor man doesn't starve 'theft'?
Yeah, I disagree. The guy responsible for millions of deaths is clearly more hostile to human existence than the guy responsible for the 'thaw' and who put into motion all the changes that led to the peaceful end of communism - which the great George Kennan called the greatest peaceful revolution in human history.
Am I? If Jews are overrepresented within certain issues should I just not talk about that fact? What about Blacks? Pakis? Women? Muslims?
No, you can, but what is your point?
Scapegoating would mean that Jews aren't actively involved in those problems.
Actually, scapegoating is exactly this: pinning problems that are common to various groups, and pretending that it's just Jews who are the problem. Of course, if you replace Jewish elites with white elites, absolutely nothing will change but you will go on a "We did it, Reddit!" victory tour.
So tell me how are you going to fix the problem if you will not talk about those organisations let alone hold them accountable for fear of being called anti-semitic?
I don't see the issue. Hold bad organizations accountable. You don't seem to be very interested in doing that. You just want to attack organizations that you perceive as being 'Jewish', even though they are nothing more than Democratic Party interest groups.
What about Muslim immigrants in Europe? They too are extremely overrepresented in violent crimes. Should we just ignore it because otherwise we would scapegoat Muslims for it?
Violent crime is largely a Muslim and immigrant issue in Europe. Also, they should not be here to begin with. So that is quite easy to take care of.
So why is it different for Jews? Why are you not allowed to talk about it? Why do you risk of being de-platformed and financially ruined if you do, when it's not supposedly just a conspiracy theory?
As far as I know, no one has been 'deplatformed' for simply pointing out that Jews seem to be disproportionately represented among the woke. Maybe for saying "the Holohoax was a lie and it's too bad that it wasn't real", but not for innocuous comments... which somehow seem to be only one step removed for some from something like that.
it's not fine to point out that Judaism considers every non-Jew as non-human cattle.
It's not true, for one. But feel free to criticize Judaism as much as you want, even on false pretenses - the same happens much more to Christianity.
Perhaps Judaism has severe issues just like Islam, just like Christianity, just like Blacks, Pakistanis or Latinos that lead to certain behavior. But we're not allowed to talk about it because "muh holocaust".
Except that in the past year, we've seen an outpouring of the most vile anti-Jewish hate that you can imagine. People on this site were cheering the Hamas atrocities of October 7... the same people who accuse Jews of 'white genocide' actually support the mass murder of Jews themselves.
Given all this, how ridiculous is it to assert that the quite innocuous claims you made on this thread are something that you are "not allowed to talk about". Or is there something more?
If nepotism is extremely prevalent in a group you can't ignore that nepotism.
Is it?
Actually, they are.
I'm a man
You're a blob.
You don't think it's a problem when individuals of an ethnic group are involved in hostile acts towards a nation
Why are you only outraged about it when you can pin it on da Jooz?
How are you going to fix a nations problem if you don't talk about the perpetrators?
Exactly. How are you going to fix the problem when you want to scapegoat Jews for it?
How about holding them accountable
How exactly do we do that?
How about talking about it?
Like what?
Endlessly repeating "Jews are overrepresented in X"? So what?
Who you think 'wins' says more about you than about the participants. Also, this guy is clearly envious of so called 'alphas'. So why not join them?
So what? Jews are overrepresented among imbeciles. What then?
You managed to name one example. I also don't see Schumer opposing abortion in Israel.
Clone him and send him to Europe, we'd love a crook who actually beings benefits rather than misery to his people.
So what is your point?
Hell, it doesn't even make sense if you don't think about it.
What is this 'pattern recognition'? That a lot of Jews do stuff I don't like? What of it? A lot of Jews also win Nobel prizes....
Divorce rape
I like this. Actual rape is fine, but divorce is RAAAAPE.
which will disproportionately impact the effeminate men who are suckered into them. He isn't shoehorning anything here. It is directly related to the post.
No, it is BS. It's hardly "women's...scam" when an effeminate man is ASKING for it.
Look man, that's not even RP. That's basic evolutionary psychology.
The issue is when you try to shoehorn it into everything. This is clearly not that.
Jews are so powerful that they manipulate white people into doing the Jews' bidding?
I honestly don't understand. I understand (but disagree with) disliking Jews for the right reasons, but the stuff these people say is just retarded.
don't care about the organisations behind illegal immigration
Which organizations are those?
What pattern?
A man of culture. Antonio likes.
I'm still waiting as to the source for your claim that Huey Long would have been 'elected'. For one, he was a Democrat. How often have incumbent presidents been defeated in the primary? Once? 1856?
The guy who won 48 states would not be defeated in a primary.
Wait, you're defending it by calling it TRP terminology?
I know a Jewish family called Drumpf. They changed their names to not appear as Jewish.
Imagine being such an idiot and then naming yourself 'Cato the Elder'.