Anyway, regarding your point...if I can even call it one, it's just a shit smear on the page, but I'll try and bring something coherent out of it.
Men's rights activists advocated for text messages confirming enthusiasm before and after the act as a response to the MeToo movement, because your hateful little cult was too busy worshipping pedophiles to care about such things as due process.
This action is a direct attack on that practice based on flimsy logic that has one sole goal - regain the power that was lost when workplaces went online and you could no longer accuse us of impropriety, because everything is recorded.
First off: Stop accusing people you don't know online of worshipping paedophilia. It makes me feel I'm responding to a 12 year old.
I am responding though because even 12 year olds need to understand that sexting is not consent. Do not fuck anybody without their consent. Do not pretend that cybersex is consent for physical interactions. Do not be stupid. Do not rape.
Also do not be stupid enough to believe that text messages sent prior to meeting someone and having sex with them will save you from a false rape accusation. They won't. Protect yourself better than that.
Well, your movement's leader was Asia Argento. You literally were worshipping a pedophile.
You are obviously a moron making false equivalencies. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, a string of messages is proof, compared to worthless claims with no backing.
Nothing will protect you, that's kind of the idea of every action women's groups have ever taken. Can't take a recording for proof, because it won't be accepted - involuntary recording, can claim coercion. Can't use past messages because that's not real consent, handily for your worthless cult of psychotic wannabe Nazis. (Did your side ever explain why your slogan is the title of an essay advocating for male extermination? Actually, probably best you don't bother, because you're perfectly happy lying through your teeth about your motives.)
Honestly, cut the attitude, it doesn't make you sound smarter at all.
I'm sorry, but the whole castration bit already betrayed your true political and social leanings, so I'm treating you like one of the true believer cultists.
Anyway, regarding your point...if I can even call it one, it's just a shit smear on the page, but I'll try and bring something coherent out of it.
Men's rights activists advocated for text messages confirming enthusiasm before and after the act as a response to the MeToo movement, because your hateful little cult was too busy worshipping pedophiles to care about such things as due process.
This action is a direct attack on that practice based on flimsy logic that has one sole goal - regain the power that was lost when workplaces went online and you could no longer accuse us of impropriety, because everything is recorded.
First off: Stop accusing people you don't know online of worshipping paedophilia. It makes me feel I'm responding to a 12 year old.
I am responding though because even 12 year olds need to understand that sexting is not consent. Do not fuck anybody without their consent. Do not pretend that cybersex is consent for physical interactions. Do not be stupid. Do not rape.
Also do not be stupid enough to believe that text messages sent prior to meeting someone and having sex with them will save you from a false rape accusation. They won't. Protect yourself better than that.
Well, your movement's leader was Asia Argento. You literally were worshipping a pedophile.
You are obviously a moron making false equivalencies. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, a string of messages is proof, compared to worthless claims with no backing.
Nothing will protect you, that's kind of the idea of every action women's groups have ever taken. Can't take a recording for proof, because it won't be accepted - involuntary recording, can claim coercion. Can't use past messages because that's not real consent, handily for your worthless cult of psychotic wannabe Nazis. (Did your side ever explain why your slogan is the title of an essay advocating for male extermination? Actually, probably best you don't bother, because you're perfectly happy lying through your teeth about your motives.)
I do apologise, I was under the misapprehension that you were replying to me.
Since all of your message is clearly directed at someone else I shall ignore it.
Who is it directed to, if not you?
Honestly, cut the attitude, it doesn't make you sound smarter at all.
I'm sorry, but the whole castration bit already betrayed your true political and social leanings, so I'm treating you like one of the true believer cultists.