From what I understand 230 defends Twitter and Facebook against being held accountable for the contents posted by users. Lets say they remove it what impact it is going to have?
Other then call for violence directly it is going to be defended by the 1'st Amendment so I do not see it hurting this giant corporations in a big way.
On top of that they are going to be allowed a time of X to remove calls to violence on their site, similar with how EU did.
What am I missing here?
The monstrosity that was the last "net neutrality" bill was already a dangerous step in the wrong direction.
I'm not sure what an internet kill switch run by the executive branch had to do with "net neutrality," but I'm glad it's gone either way.
Oh yeah, bills to elevate Net Neutrality to a law, have been uniformly trojan-horse garbage. 100%.
This is why we can't have nice things.