The bed-wetters opposing any kind of self-defense don't realize that they mark themselves out as people who will never fight back. Guess what, people are more likely to attack someone if they get off scott-free than if they get their skull smashed for their pains.
Except for the fact that women from every level of society will try to ruin him for doing so. He's not going to get the golden opportunity that Sandmann did, he will be utterly ruined and pushed to suicide, just like the last academic who dared to state women's studies is not a necessary course for humanity.
Except for the fact that women from every level of society will try to ruin him for doing so.
Sometimes I think you live on an uninhabited island where there is only one woman, and she is a bigly bitch...
he will be utterly ruined and pushed to suicide
People can smell your fear and it makes it all the more likely that they will attack you. Rest assured that this abominable midget would not have attacked anyone who would have smashed her face for it.
just like the last academic who dared to state women's studies is not a necessary course for humanity.
He may be overzealous but he's right on this one. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of situation, except the non-aggression option is consistently the better outcome in the longer term. The third option of walking or running away is also seen as a greater weakness than just standing there to take it. It may seem counter-intuitive but of those 3 options available less people will take the opportunity to mess with them because he stood there and took it. He got lucky in getting a favourable outcome from this, that's all.
That'd be nice. Just avoid the one awful person and live happily. I may be exaggerating slightly, but let's think about his life progression - he has to get through school with grades from a teacher who is most likely female. After that, he has to go to college or work, both of which involve going through their diversity and inclusion Gestapo. You don't really want to paint a target on your back right now, even if Trump wins, it's doubtful that he could or even would take the required action.
Nobody would risk attacking her back because you'll be characterized as worse than Sandmann and end up receiving death threats from female celebrities like he did.
let's think about his life progression - he has to get through school with grades from a teacher who is most likely female.
Can't lie, in the past few months, I've become a bit prejudiced against white women. I always want to make sure that they are not part of the woke Stasi.
You don't really want to paint a target on your back right now, even if Trump wins, it's doubtful that he could or even would take the required action.
He won't do a thing. But if you don't defend yourself, then you decrease the costs for attacks on you, which is rather stupid.
Nobody would risk attacking her back because you'll be characterized as worse than Sandmann and end up receiving death threats from female celebrities like he did.
I have never considered such a thing. Which is why I don't get attacked. People know what is going to happen. Again, you're like the guy saying that you don't want to be a in a nuclear war, because it's bad, while not considering that deterrence prevents it.
Except for the fact that women from every level of society will try to ruin him for doing so. He's not going to get the golden opportunity that Sandmann did, he will be utterly ruined and pushed to suicide, just like the last academic who dared to state women's studies is not a necessary course for humanity.
Sometimes I think you live on an uninhabited island where there is only one woman, and she is a bigly bitch...
People can smell your fear and it makes it all the more likely that they will attack you. Rest assured that this abominable midget would not have attacked anyone who would have smashed her face for it.
Mike Adams?
He may be overzealous but he's right on this one. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of situation, except the non-aggression option is consistently the better outcome in the longer term. The third option of walking or running away is also seen as a greater weakness than just standing there to take it. It may seem counter-intuitive but of those 3 options available less people will take the opportunity to mess with them because he stood there and took it. He got lucky in getting a favourable outcome from this, that's all.
That'd be nice. Just avoid the one awful person and live happily. I may be exaggerating slightly, but let's think about his life progression - he has to get through school with grades from a teacher who is most likely female. After that, he has to go to college or work, both of which involve going through their diversity and inclusion Gestapo. You don't really want to paint a target on your back right now, even if Trump wins, it's doubtful that he could or even would take the required action.
Nobody would risk attacking her back because you'll be characterized as worse than Sandmann and end up receiving death threats from female celebrities like he did.
Possibly, I posted about it forever ago.
Can't lie, in the past few months, I've become a bit prejudiced against white women. I always want to make sure that they are not part of the woke Stasi.
He won't do a thing. But if you don't defend yourself, then you decrease the costs for attacks on you, which is rather stupid.
I have never considered such a thing. Which is why I don't get attacked. People know what is going to happen. Again, you're like the guy saying that you don't want to be a in a nuclear war, because it's bad, while not considering that deterrence prevents it.