Prostasia has become notable for getting promoted by OneAngryGamer in the wake of the UN ban on pornographic artwork featuring underage characters, however their site contains multiple articles defending NOMAPs and promoting regressive leftist conspiracy theories such as the "alt-right" conspiracy theory.
One of the sites they list in prostasia.org/get-help/ is blatantly connected to pro-pedo group FreeSpirits.
Because of this, no-one should support Prostasia as they are engaged in unethical activism.
Prostasia fear-mongers about the Qanon BS while bashing critics of George Soros and the Rothschild's as antisemites, falsely suggesting there is nothing wrong with Islam, and bashing allegations of elite sex trafficking rings: https://archive.is/H3Azg
Prostasia uses "alt-right" to slander critics of the tedtalk that was criticized for defending NOMAPs: https://archive.is/WhdO7
examples of Prostasia defending NOMAPs: https://archive.is/kYGgk
A "non offensive minor-attracted person". Basically a pedo who hasn't committed a crime.
Which would be fine, they exist and the word "pedo" is so loaded that they would be crucified if admitting to it. Which would only drive them into hiding and etc. etc.
But seeing the types who join those communities and openly call themselves such, it deserves none of that leeway and is seemingly full of the same predatory types as the rest of the Intersectionality crew. And likely already committed a crime and just not caught yet.
In other words, being on the fringe of society is normal, celebrating the fringe is not.
It's how we've got here with all sorts of rights and censorship. Not surprised it continues to get worse.
Right. That's my big concern honestly with even our own sides frenzied hate of pedos. Its the fastest track to censorship and rights being taken. Because they always take easy fringe targets we all hate first, and then use that precedent opening to oppress further.
These people should never be celebrated. Should they be offered help if they are truly innocent? Certainly, if only to reduce the risk of an actual crime happening. But always reminded they are abnormal and no amount of debate will make them anything but wrong. And snakes attempting to blur that line to predate should be thrown from buildings without care.
"Our side" has no issues with pedo panic so I suggest you stop fearmongering about it. If you are refering to anti-loli spergs that is a seperate issue.
I do agree about your statement about how It's a-ok to force these people to seek mental help before they offend, and that they should just accept the fact that their sexuality is bad and that it shouldn't be accepted.
Anti-loli spergs are literally the same beliefs and people, so its not separate. Its just a further extreme of the same crusade. You can't just say "nope, not" and it be true.
And its not fearmongering, its reminding people to put aside their emotional reaction to pedos, because we all fucking hate them, and logically think through the things they say and the consequences of doing so.
For example, I said nothing about forcing to seek help. Because the moment you make it legal to force people into therapy, a whole lot of us would be put in the chair for wrong think just like them. Its the Left that controls the psychology world, and it would only take a couple bucks to pay a shitty study to say "Right wing ideology connects to pedophilia" and now they have just cause to put us "dangerous risks" in institutions to.
You incentivize taking it, mostly by cracking hard on offenders and letting them know there is an option that is safe. Because right now they are stuck in the "What's the punishment for lateness? Death. And rebellion? Also Death" cycle.
"non offensive minor-attracted person" is a paradox, to be a pedo is offensive in and of itself.
I think it's actually intended as "non offending" as in they haven't diddled a kid yet
I also belive that it likely means they haven't gone to look at CP, then again individual definitions of nomap may vary...
In this case the "offense" is in the legal sense. In that they claim to be innocent of any crime. Which might be true, in that we aren't at the point where thoughts are crimes yet.
But, as said before, nobody NOMAP described seems to actually be clean in any sense and are just lying outright.
I'd have to see what they're actually doing before I give these orgs any support. If they are actually trying to find ways to keep these people from offending, that's a good thing. If they are merely a group to preach apologism, then they need to go.